Laserfiche WebLink
PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />,~~ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br />r i RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br />A regular meeting of the Mounds 4tew Planning Comnission was called to ordeP by <br />Acting Chairman Fedor at 7:34 PM on July 12, 1978 at the Mounds View City Nal7, <br />2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota 55112, <br />Members Present: <br />Acting Chairman Fedor <br />Commission Member 4lanchard <br />Ccmmission Member Burmeister <br />Comnission Member Foss <br />Commission Member Glazer <br />Comnission Member Quan <br />A1so Present; <br />Counciimember Baumgartner <br />Bullding and Zoning Official Rose <br />Acting Chairman Fedor stated the ninutes of the June 28, 1978 meeting were approved <br />as read. <br />MINOR SUBOIVISION REQUEST Of JOHN KOI.LOUGE - 2816 SHERNDOD RCRD <br />.~Official Rose reported that the appllcant I~as requested to divide his property lnto <br />~ two parcels A and B where "A" is, the east half of the west 150 feet of the east <br />'~-~300 feet of Lot 64, Audttors Subdivision No. 89, subfect to easements of record, if <br />any, and where "B" is, the west half of the west 150 feet of the eas+ 300 feet of <br />Lot 64, ~uditors Subdivision no. 89, sub,~ect to easements of record, if any. <br />Official Rose reported tnat the existing and proposed zoning is designated as R-1, <br />single family, and the applicant intends the tat to be used for single family. <br />7he house and garage on proposed Parcel D meet setback requiremements, but the garage <br />on Parcel A does not meet setback requirements, being appraximately 4' froni the property <br />line. For approvai of the 1ot with a 75' frontage, the garage on Parcel "A" must ue <br />removed unless a pennit for a singl~ family house is requested without a garage and the <br />garage is relocated 5' from the property line. 8oth parcels meet area requirements, <br />and water and sewe~~ are available to both parcels. <br />Gommission Member Quan asked if there was any access to the garage. Gfficial Rose <br />replied that the building is actua7ly an oversized accessory building which is <br />classified as a garage because of its size. He added that it has a slab fowldation, <br />and is an existing non-conforming use. <br />Mr. Kallodge Sr. stated that he would move the garage if he had to. <br />Official Rose asked how soon construction wos planned to begln. Mr. Kollodge Jr. <br />stated that he would be building on the lot and that he woutd have to apply for a loan <br />first, before he would know when canstruction would start. He added that he would <br />like to use the garage in the interi+~m, for stora3e and such, and that he did not plan <br />on building a garage with his new home to ~tai^t with. <br />! ~cting Chairman Fedor asked if the subdivision could b~ approved with the garage teft <br />~" on the ~ot as it was ,~ust to be an interiwn use. Official Rose rep7led that it was <br />the perrogative of the Planning Cortmission and City Council to approve it but pointed <br />uut that the ardinance change was written to a17ow the narrower lots but that all <br />setback requirements w~re to be m~t. <br />