1978-07-12 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

July 12, 1978 ~. i' Page 2 ~1l11~Commission Member Foss potntzd out that the 1ot meets a11 requirements and the huildlny - ~vould be temporary, Comnission Plember Burmeister replied that they could not be sure how temporary it was going to be, as it could be two weeks or several months. She added that the ordinance was changed to a11ow the smal7er lot size, and they should not be over lenient. Comnission Member Foss stated he would 11ke to see the appiicant 6e aEte to use the bulYding for storage without relocating it. Comnission Me.nb~r Burmeister replied that she could not see the hardship invoTved. Acting Chairman fedor askeA if the applicant planned to take down the shed once he was issued a huilding perniit for a garage, and if so, how long that would be. Mr. Koitodge Jr. repiied that it wouid not be longer than one year. Acting C4airnian Fedor stated he felt it would be a waste of money to have to move the building one fioo1:. CommlSSion Member Foss asked if a time period could be set 4or the removai of the garage. Comnission Member Glazer pointed out that a variance would be required to a71ow the interium use. Acting Chaiimar Fedor asked iP a time iimit couid 6e enforced for the garage, OfPicial Rose replied that Staff feels it wauld real1y weaken the ordinance change which had ~ust 6een passed. Commission Mc-m6er Quan asked what had been done in tha past. Officta7 Rose replied that they usually require the applicant to remove the butldina in its entirety. j~Commission Member Burmeister stated she did not feel the decision shou7d be based on money. She added that concern had been expressed when the ordinance change was writtan that the setback requirements be mec, and they should follow the ordinance. MSP (Glazer-Foss) to recomriend to,the Council that they approve the minor subdivlsinn request of John Kollodge at 2416 Sherwood Drive for a minor su6division uf one 1ot inCo two, the west 15G feet of the east 300 feet of I.ot 64, Auditors Su6division N~. 89, Ramsey County, idinnesota, and that Mr. Kotlodgc be granted a variance on the side yard setback for the garage thet is Tocated on Parcei A, a variance of 1', With the stipulation that the structure 6e removed folluwing one year after the bullding permtt is issued, 5 ayes 1 n~y Comnission Member Burmeister stated she had voted against the motion as the ordinance ? was changed to a11ow 150' 1~t subdlvisions, provided everything on the tots met all ~, requirements, inciuding set bac~:s. She added she did not feel the Planning Commissinn should give 1n, even if it was ,~ust Yor 1'. i MINOR SUBDIVISION REpUEST QF ELLEN FIEGE - 8250 KNOLL(~000 DRIVe ;i ,~ Cortmission Member Foss excused himself due to a confiict of interest on the subdiv9sion request. ~ Official RosE reported that the appL'c~~nt has requested to divide part of Lot 34 and 35, Au~ttors Subdiv!sion No, 89, into parcels A and 8, where parcel A is tBe north 90 feet ~of the south i27 Peet oP lot 35 except the west 218 Peet thereof, puditors Subdivision No. 89, Ramsey County, Minnesota, sub,~ect te Knollwood Drive and easements of record, if any, and parcel D is the south 127 feet of L~L 35 except the north 90 feet, except the west 218 feet thereof and also the north 103 feet o4 Lot 34, except the west 218 feet th?reof, Auditors Subdivision No. 89, Ramsey Caunty, ~dinnesota, subJect to Ardan