Laserfiche WebLink
July 26, 1478 Page 7 <br />Chrlsttan Center or et 591ver View Park. <br />{'~ Commlesion Member 9urmetYter seid sha cert sea merft in e11 of the <br />svggesLions and wouid reCher noC vote for ~ust one of them. <br />Commission Member Quen seld he woutd put the bwidge/walkway pro~ect <br />before the perkinq iot. <br />Commisslon Member etancherd seid she would puE Metro Trensportetion <br />first end Ceh hiketrall system/bridge second. <br />Commisslon Member Burmeister sAid the biketrell woutd be fine. <br />Commisslon Member alezer sa5d a 6lkeway network would be number one <br />for h1m but he felt there would be a problem wlth stdewalks. He <br />falt Chis was turning tnto a spending rece and he ahted to sa !t. <br />~halrpersn Heake agregd cnd snld thls 1s what "Propostitfon 13" is <br />a11 ebout. <br />Commisslon Member Fedor sald a bikeWay w12h a brldge would be <br />number cne. <br />Chelrparson Haake seld when the Coucnil or Ctty decides to go Por <br />Federel A1d Urban money that may be avallable they should 6e aware <br />the recommendatlon of the Pianning Commission !s that the City of <br />Mounds View should pursu~ as a Lop prlorlty ~ aomprehenslve blkeway/ <br />welkway eystem with e bridge that aould cross Nighway 30 in <br />~°"~ correspondancs wlth the Park nnd Recreattor Commtssion's eike/Malkwny <br />~, pten and teh second priority is a municipel parking 1ot lncated on a <br />bus ~outa. To support Che request for the aedestrlan Aikeway/walkway <br />system, see Page 82 of the Comprehenslve P1an which indicaBes tYe C1ty <br />already has made an effort Loward seeing thts eoc~a to Ae hy signailza- <br />Lian of the intersectlons at County Road H2 and Hlghway 10 nnd County <br />Noad I and INghwa,V 30. <br />I Commission Member ~tazer asked 1f anyone felt the City shouldn't even ; <br />~ petltton for these funds. Commission Member Quan felt the City should ; <br />try 1t but patnted out that thedriorlty system seems to 6e campTicated. i <br />Chalrpers~ Heake sald she agreed with what Commission Member Glazer had I <br />satd ebout the rating. She said if 1lounds V1ew's proJect wi11 Ge rated ~ <br />~ according to Pro~ect R39, wM ch is iaw and moderate ireoma, and !f it ; <br />means ba.rgeining 1n that term, then they can keep their federal funds. ~ <br />! C~mmission Member fe6or satd tt appears the granC witi not cover ~ <br />' acquisiClon costs. Chalrparson Haake revlev~ed the information and j <br />` ouinted os~t thet 1t w111 cover the acquls?tlon costs if it is 9ncluded ; <br />~ ?n a larger pro,~ect that 1s eteglble, whlch wou1d be the bridge. I <br />MS9 (Nurmeister-~lazer) to ad~ourn at 8:57 PM 6 eyes , <br />Respect4u11y submitted, <br />i <br />~ , Caria W1rth <br />`~/ Rec~rdfng Secretary <br />