Laserfiche WebLink
August 9, 1978 <br />Page 2 <br />received and submitted written proof to the City that the owner of the property or the <br />City of New Brighton issued him right of way to Oid Highway 8, A variance would be <br />required far the curb cuts which exceed 22' if a code revision is not made. An B' <br />varlance would be required on the 01d Highway 8 curb cut, and a 2' variance would be <br />required on the MusCang Road curb cut and the southeast curb cut. <br />Minimum R9rking requirements are met and exceeded, driveway and parkfng areas are <br />concreee curbed. Orainage is directed to Mustang Road for pickup in the City's exist- <br />ing system and sewer and water services are aveilable for both lots. Exterior lighting , <br />would be mounted on the buildings, m~e"r~c code section 40.04 N, G1are, and trash <br />enclasures meet code requirements. Offici4l Rose recanmended that the trash enclosuras <br />be constructed of concrete. He added that the planting schedule and ~reen area meet <br />minimum code requlrements. <br />Offlcial Rose recomnended that deeds must be submitted with covenants approved by the <br />City Attorney, and a park fund deAication is required for the subdivisio~, ~nd both ' <br />individuai f9rms wiil be required ta bond or escrow cash for the paW ng, curb, lafid- <br />scaping and screening improvements. <br />Mr. Stpinmueller, of Midwuy Industrial Suppiy Co. stat•ed he was witH ng to gtve the s <br />easements and that he did have permission From the County to put a curb cut an Old ~ <br />Nighway 8. ~ <br />MS° (Haake-Blanehard) ta raquest that the City Cuuncil chanye Che ordlnaiue for curb ~ <br />cuts that are requiwed on comnercial and industrial Propert.Y be increased to a maximum <br />~ of 36', and that the curb cuts in residehtial areas be maintained at 22'. 5 ayes ~ <br />1 abstain~ <br />Camn i,s ion Mem ber Foss s ta te d he was a bs ta in ing from t he vo te s ioce he fe t t t hey s hou l d ~ <br />6e more flexible with the makimum and:someone,may want a wider driveway. Offici~l Rose <br />replied that they co~id then apply for a variance. ,j <br />Comnission Member Glazer asked what.business NASCO was in.. ~r. Thesanga repiled ~ <br />that NASCO is a~~holesale welding and safety supply firm for a ten state area. He ; <br />added that he uses cumnon carriers such as UPS and Parcel Post. <br />Commi,sion Member Butmeister asked what type of business Midway Supply was. Mr. Stein- ~ <br />mueller replied that he is an industrial spray finisliing equipment wholesaler, and s <br />covers a five state area. He added that he also uses curtmon carrier. x <br />, <br />~ <br />Cnmmission Member G7azer asked if Rice Creek Watershed pistwict had approved the drainage ~ <br />plans. Official Rose replied that the plar,s had not been sent to them and befare the ; <br />City Engineer had left, he had discussed the draiaage plan with him and it was the <br />Fngineer's feeling that tM s did not require Rice Cr2ek Watershed Oistrict appravai as ; <br />there is an existSng system. Gomnission Member Glazer replled that fie felt the plans q <br />should be sent to them. ? <br />Comnission Mamber Burmeister asked if anything vrouid be included in the develnpment <br />agree~nent about maintaining plantings. Official Rose replied that they will 5e required <br />to maintain them for ane year. Mr. Thffsanga added that they will be installing a <br />sprinkiing system to maintain the plantings. <br />~ <br />