Laserfiche WebLink
YduCSEDIN05 OF THE P'LA.NNING COMMI~SION <br />~ CYTY OF MOUNAS VIEW <br />RAtQSEY COUNTY, MINtiESOTA <br />A ragular maeting of the Dioundo Vi.aw Planning Commiseion wae called <br />to order by Chairpereon Haeke at 7:30 PM ott Uecember 13, 1978 at eha <br />Mounds View City He.ll, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds Viaw, Minneeota 55112, <br />Membere Preeent: <br />Chairpereun Haake <br />Commiaeion Mamber Blanchard <br />~eromi~sion Member BuY~neiater <br />Commieaion Nlembar Glazer <br />Commieeion M~uber Quan <br />Also Preeent; <br />Councilmember Baumgartner <br />Building ::~,d Zaning Official Rose <br />Members Abaent: <br />Cocmuiesion Membez Fedor <br />Commiseion Member Foes <br />Chairpereon Haake asked for any correcCions to r.he Novembar 29, 19~8 <br />meettng minutee. <br />I~Commiseion Member Glazer aeked that on page 5 anuther oint be added to <br />°`~-~the list of queetione to be answered by the Mat Counci~, with thet point <br />belng how doas Mounde Vi.ew's houeing compoeition with xeepect to low coet <br />houeing, compare with its neighbors. <br />Commieaion Member Fedor joined Che meeting at Chia tiwe. <br />MSP (Haa?:e-G1aze=) to approve tbe minuCes of the November 29, 1978 meet- <br />ing as corrected. 6 ayea <br />OLYIdPIA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - 7624 EDGCWOOD DRIVE - TRIPLEX. DEVELOPMENT <br />Official Ruea raported Chat Staff had met with Mr. Benson since hie re- <br />queat was denied by the Planning Cammiesion, and that Mr. Heaeon had <br />requeeted another sppearance befdre the Ylanning Commtesion. <br />Officiel Roae reported that the applicant's plot plan dnoa meet minimum <br />oode seeback aa the preeene code allows. 0££ic~.al Roee r~porCed that <br />the requeshed Criplex does not fiC into either definition for a toc.mhauea <br />or wultiple dwelling, se multiple dwellinge requira a ~oint entrance and <br />townhouses require owner. occupation, He added that the triplex ie propoeed <br />to be rental property and rental propezty genernlly doee not provide the <br />grxater amount of gare.ge epaoes ve, owner occupied property and thereEore <br />recommanded that 2y spac~3o per unit 6e req_ui~ad, o£ whiah one would be a <br />qnrege apace. <br />~~Of£icial Roae recommendad that the Planning Commieeion consider an ardi- <br />nanca chenge of 40.02 Sub. B~k34 definiCion of u niultip2e dwelling,ellowiag <br />joint or aeparate main antr,ancse for apartments, leaving the townhouea <br />definition untouahed. <br />