1979-01-10 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.January 10, 1979 Page 2 0££icial Roee etated that the rezoninq had been approved for the ~ther lots in this area and, furthor, that Mr. Tliorson's lots notu r let the minimum aize raquirements. He added that there is an exietinq utility lino which paesea through Lot 2, rrhich would have to be moved unlesa it could be built around. The easementa are adequate Eor dxuinage and public i.mprovemente, and there ie a culvert located above lot 7 which draina into tha Kxaus Andereon property, and thare is aleo existing drainage, Official Roea aleo etated that development controle would include a bond or caeh eacrow for the improvement, plantinga, buildi.ng alevatione and proposed gradinge and a bond or cash escrow for the lnt development. Coir~niseton Member Burmeieter aeked if Mr. Thoreon w~uld skill have two curb cute and a circular driveway. 0£ficiei Rose replied that he would, with the front of the lote draining to Silver Lake ~oad. Conm~iesion Member Glazer aeked what the atat-us was af the drainage on the east eide of 511ver Lake Road on the Kraus Anderaon property. Official Roae replied that any existing drainageways would have to be left open or have a conduit placed over them. Co~nisai.on Member Giazer also aeked where Che a*ater goea fr.ow Silver Lake Road. Offic3al Rose replied that Silver Lake Road draina to either eide oS the road and Che natui•al drainage flow ia in a souY.heasterly d3recti.on, and pointed out on a map the flow of the drainage. Mr. Thorson atated L•he only thing he had to add to what Official Rose had ''~tready explained was that he would be putCing 1~t one fire hydrant on :lver Lake R~ad. Official Rose explained that Staff and the Fire Chief ~-cfave re~uired that if Mr. Thoreon developed al~n9 Silver,Lake Road tiiat a hydrant was needed. Commiseion biunber Burmeister pointed out that the aubdivision was denied on November 9, 1977, yet Mr. Thoraon is preaently buildin~ a home there now. Offlcial Roae explained that he has the right to pull one permit for one lot, and that Mr. Ttioreon has placed the home on the lot to allow for future development. Official Rose added that the attorn~y has determined th~t an applicant has the le al right to pull a perwit f4r one h.ome as lonq as it did not hamper fu~ure development of the total property. Leonard Kramer stated he was representing hia ~arents who own lote 1 and 2. Mr. Kramer atated that hia parenl•s had been at the meeting l~et February suFporting che inetallati.un of aervicea by ehe City. He added that thera were only a few people in oppoaition to having the City put the eervices in at thak t~me. ldr.'Kramer explained that he and his partata have nothing againat Dailey Homea aince he feels the development would be in both theia• best intereat and the City's, but if Mr. T.horeon puts his own servicee in, it could cost them up to another $10,000 to put their services in. Chairperaon Haake asked if Mr. Kramer would like all Che property oomera to put in servioes now. Mr. Kramer replied that he would like a11 of them to get involved now. He added that the water inatallation would not be too coatly but the sanitary sewer would be. s. Kramer stated ehe was afraid that if Mr. Thorson put his own ~ervices , and she put her own service in, and aince they are at different eleva- ~Eione, they could not connect and would thue leave Lhe middle prn~~erCy ownere ouC. She added, though, that Che middle property ownere had been sgainat having the servicea put in since thsir loea were not buildable.