1979-01-24 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PAOCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ,Q~ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW f J RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNE30TA A regul~r meeting of the Mounde View Planning Co~ntesion was called to order by Acting Chairperaon Fedor at 7:35 PM on January 24, 1974 at the Mounde View City Hall, 2401 Highmay l0, Mounde V~ew, Minnesota 55112. Membere Preaent: ActinE Chairperson Fedor Co~iseion Idember Bl~nchard Co~niasion hIember Burmeister Commiebion Member Foea Commiesion Member Glazer Also Present: Building and 2oning Official Roae Councilmember Forslund. Membere Absent: Chairperaon Haake Commiasion Member Quan It was noted that Chairpereon Haake had stated at that previoua meeting that she wauld be out of town on January 24, and that Co~iseion Member Quan had stated he also would not be available for the mertinq. Councilmember Farslund asked that the minutes of the January 10, 1979 {~~eeting be changed to read on page 5, aeventh paragraph, that Mr. "+-~^Tobiason had tried to give hie land to the City aeveral yeare ago becauee he falt it wae undevelopable, and that the Council had said at that time that developere ehould put in their. own services. MSP (Burmeieter-Fosa) to approve the minutes of the January 10, 1979 meeting as corrected. 5 ayes MAJOR SUBDIVISION AND REZONI~G - BAYPORT BUILDERS INC. Qf£icial Rose reparked that the applir.ant has requested to combine and subdivide aix lots iitto Cen and rezone r.wo £rom R-1 to R-2. Planning considerations include thet both the exieting zoning and com- prehenetve land use deaignations are R-1 single family, }iut that rezoning of the propoead Lote 5 and 6 from R-1 to R-2 fronting County Road I ia typical of other eubdivixion requeste alon6 a minor arterial. Also, LoT. 7 oE the proposed plat has an existing qrandfaihered doc7 kpnnel uee. Of~icial Rose reported that sYl lota conform to existing code requixe- mente or pollciea in both £zontage nnd area . mhe policy bF. a1lQwing lote greater than 160 feet in width to be dlvided equally provided that all oCher requirementa execspting lat frontage requirementa are met, ia not in the new cade, ae it wes in the old zoning code. " Pfficial Rose reviewed l•tie frentage requiremente that were recently ~Ceviaed for minor aubdivisione and recommended, eince the revision would not apgly for thie applicant, that the old pol.icy and cade could be adopted ae Chapter 40.06, Subdivision B(4), whioh w~n1d allow the applicant to carry through with the eubdivision and meet the exiating