1980-06-18 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MOUNDS VIEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Page 4 June 18,1980 scussion on thc lack af time before this meeting to iew this proposai so that some criteria for recom- ~iiendaCioas for structure, considerations for the soil, etc. could 6e carefully considered. The desire was to present a comprehensive 11st of recomnendations to the Ccuncii. Mountin made a motion, seconded by Warren to table the ma~or subdivision rezoning request from Mr. John Miller (Case 47-80) instructing the planning comnissioners to review mmiiciapl lvt 4?.-07 and diacuss tMs item a~ain un July 2nd. Aye-McCerthy, Warren, Mountin THE MOTION FAILS FOR LACK Of MAJORITY. Hay-Goebel, Glazcr, Haake Mountin and W.arren stated they feit more Cime taas needed to consider this proposat. Goebel stated he felt a deti- sion could b~ made at this time. Geobel made a mation, secondzd by McCarthy to take a recess. The Planning Comnission recessed for a break at 9:05 P.M: The meeting resumed at 9:12 P.M. j gbel made a motion to recomnend to ~;ouncil that the +~tin Millcr proper*.~ under consideration, Case 47-80, Item N4, be given consideration by the Council. The Vlanning CuniNssion finds that the subdivision and proposed tayout does meet tlie requirements for development of tha area under the condition that some areas'of R-1 zor~ing appear to be inciuded in the industriat development and that request for rezoning did not come before the Corrmission before the subdivision of the pro- perty was considered. In other words, barring the compliance of the subdfvfsian meeting thc zoning requirements of the area, thts pl&n seems to meet the other requirements of the Gity. We wou]d 11ke to make no*.e of some characteristics of thfs for the Council's consideration: 1) EssentiaTly ati the area is comprlsed of soil with severe limitations, i.e, wetlands that the City has fought to consarve in the past, 2) Recomnend that no more than 50% impervious surface be on any of the lots when fully developed because of the wetness limitations as noted. Haake seconded the motion. No action was taken on this motion. McCarthy made a moCion, seconded by Mountin to table this proposal untii the next vrork session (6-25-80) which would yive tyr Comnission time for discussion and careful considerations. This item will then be removed from the table at the regular ~ting on July 2nd, ~R'~es-McCarthy, Mountin, Marren, Glazer THE MOTION CARRIES (MOTION CARRIESj Nay-Goebel, Naake