Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNDS VIEW PLHNNING COhffi1ISSION <br />page 5 <br />--------^-------°-----------°°_.----° <br />~ntin made a ~notion, seconded by Warren, <br />''~~,~'!quest7ng Staff to provide i:he Planulny <br />Comnission with cupies of the first drafts <br />of the Council minutes so they could have <br />an opportunity tn review the Gouncil's activities <br />as soon as tt~e minutes were available. <br />/~yes-6 THE MOTION WAS CARRIED <br />Naya-0 <br />REGULAR MEE7IN0 <br />~une 18,1980 <br />--°-° ~-°----°---------° ---° ° - <br />Official Rose presented the chanyes the <br />Council had made at their last agenda meeting <br />on this resolution proposal: <br />H5a(2): To read"The developer proposes to re-zone <br />the porcel of a~+prnximately 3.8 acres and outlined <br />in yellow on Exhibit H as R-4.'~ <br />#5a(3): To read "The developer proposed to ,ubmit a <br />P.U.D. for the property outlined 9n purple on Exhibit <br />H t~ith 4 or tess living untts per acre." <br />#5a(4): To read "The developer proposed to submit a <br />/"'~U.D. for the property outtined 1n pink on Exhibit H <br />(,~th 4 ar less living units per acre." <br />N7A: 7o read " . limited to the retocation or <br />removal uf 228 000 (instead of 23F.,OOU) cubic ay rds <br />of materla7~~ <br />Goebel made a mokion, secoqded by Naake to recortmend <br />D-2 on 10, moving 3.8 acres south for R-4. <br />1{yes-5 <br />Nay-1 (Mountin) Opposed ta R-4 for lack of assurity <br />that it w~uld bp guaranteed. <br />TNE MOTiON CARRIES <br />7, MINUTES OF CITY C9UNCIL <br />TO PLANNING COMMISION <br />(MOTION CARRIES) <br />8. AGREEMENT REVIEVl, M&E REAL7Y <br />RESOLUTION NUMBER 1100 <br /> <br />Chairperson Mountln temporarily left the meettng at 10:40 P.M. <br />Gaebe7 made a motton, seconded by Glazer, to recomnend <br />4 units/acre at R-1. <br />P.yes-Glazer, Warren, Haake, Goebel <br />Nay-McCarthy(Does feel a need for tnwnhouse development <br />and this would be a good place for it. Aiso, does not <br />want that lower corner to go any higher than R-i.) <br />THE MOTION WAS CARRIEA. <br />Council will discuss this propasal at the June 23rd meeting. <br />The Planniny Commission also discussed the desire to see <br />a.Y~he elderly highrise pr•oposal retsined by the devetoper, <br />~; <br />(MUTION CARRIES) <br />(MOTION CARRIES) <br />