Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Comnlssion Mey 6, 1981 <br />Regular Pteetiag Pege Three. <br />--------------------------------------------^---~-^--------^---°------------- <br />Comnissio~er Breske esked if there wes eny reeson <br />~ beside5 personal preferenee of remodelln~ insteed <br />of loeating 1n an office buitding? 14r. Lamni staCed <br />that he would own the land. Further that he would <br />not be living there. <br />Offlcial~ROSe slrawed graphlcs of Che pr•oposal. Mr. <br />Lammi said that the architect mede the shop took as much <br />residential es he could. <br />Chelrperson Mountin steted thet she is concerned because <br />the ComprehensiVe Plan dlscoureges development alnng <br />Nlghwey 10 theL is outside of the City Canter. <br />Motion Second: McCarthy/Warren moved to deny the request <br />an eccep~iisolution No. 15-8;, with the last word in <br />the peraqraph of Che Znd Whereas he changed from area; <br />to loC; (Amended Resolution is attached). <br />6 ayes 0 nays Mot~on~Cerrled. <br />Those 1~ atteadance for this cese were: Fred Haas, 8. Marvtn H. Anderson- Approxl- <br />Vice Aresident, Marvln H. Anderson Construction; Jerry mately 7600 Hwy. 10., Mixed <br />Fostar, Kraus~Anderson; nnd Pet3 Yan Hauer, Generat Planned Unit Oevelopment <br />Counsel, Health Central. (R-1, R-3, B-2) Residential <br />Comnercial Development - <br />~ Mr. Haas made a lengthly presentation of the proposal. Resolutton No. 25-81 <br />' He discussed the changes of the streets per Che ConsuTting <br />Engineeps request. He said that they plan to deve1op <br />the single famlly erea flrst, then the townhoines. Further <br />thet Che panding area would be developed et the same L•ime <br />the single famity erea is deveTop~d, He would 11ke to <br />divide the doubte lots and have zern 1at lines beceuse <br />of eesicr ftrtanctrtg. Also, Lhat Kraus-Anderson would <br />be developing t'he comnercial area. <br />Com~issloner McCartl~y stated that the Park Comnlssion <br />is concerned because there is no access Co the Park on <br />the northwesC corner ef' the proNosal. She feels that ~ <br />they need anather entrance. Mr. Haas stated that they <br />presently heve four accesses to the park. Dlscusslon <br />in length took place regarding the pathways ta the <br />park. Glazer volced opposition ~regarding the dredging <br />of the pond and zero lot lines. <br />Jerry Foster, Kraus-Anderson, stated that they were <br />propasing a 72 untt residerttfal bu11d4ng for the e]derly. <br />Also a medtcal office building, retail offtce, office, <br />and sit down restaurant and across the street, two more <br />office buitdings. He seld that they are entering 9~to an <br />agreement, wtth Health CPntral to provlde a medlcal ofHce <br />bul1ding for the elAerly. <br />Comnissioner Warren asked why the resldential buildtng for <br />~ <br />the elderly was plac~d ~n Highwey 10, She voiced concern <br />regarding the heatth of the senior cttlzens (t.e. noise, <br />fvmes, trafftc). COmmtsstoner McCarkhy stated that <br />nrlglnally they wanted that unit down b,y the ponding area. <br />