My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981-05-06 PC Minutes
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
1981-05-06 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2009 4:09:58 PM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:24:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~ <br />~ <br />Mounds W ew Plenning Comnisslon May 6, ]9R1 <br />Regular Meeting, Pege Six. <br />------------°^---~--------°---°---------°--~--°------------------------ <br />A1so, that the surpectin9 Lhey use is only one drum. <br />,.-., They uae powder end nn 1lquids. <br />i <br />Mr. We11y stated that he does not know how they can <br />redestgn the building to meet a?1 of the Codes. <br />Motto Second: Wnrren/M111er moved to approve the <br />var ance o 30' setbeck on the north property line <br />and to accept Resolution No~ i7-81 wlth the fo116Ming <br />chanpes: Whereex, peregreph 4, the appiicent "can" be <br />changed to"cannot". Nheress, par~egreph 5, ba eltminated. <br />After'ROw, Therefore, be it resoTved, Ehet the Mounds <br />View Planning Comnlssion "approves" the request etc. <br />Lest line under Be Tt Further Resolved to read; <br />approved with a 30' sethack to the north property 11ne <br />and be included to rePTect staff considerations. <br />(Amended Resolution is attached). <br />Dlseussian of the MotioO • Corcmissioner McCerthy <br />ee s t a s s not a hardship, that he could <br />purchnse la~d from another property owner. <br />Chairperson Mountin sWted that she feels that the <br />int shouid be af a more useable size with additional <br />width and depth. <br />Call of the vote: <br />5 ayes 1 nay (McCarthy vnted nay) <br />McCarthy stated that she feels that <br />no hardsM p has been demonstrated. <br />Mr. Charles West, representing E.T. Hughes Construc- 11 <br />tlon Company was in aYtendance. <br />Motton Sewnd:.Mitter/McCerthy movea to accept <br />' so u on o. 18-81 as wr9tten. (Resolutlon is <br />atteehedj. <br />Discussion on the Motion: <br />Commlsslaner Marren ~sked if this would be Section 8 <br />Housing. F9r. West steted that 9t woutd nct. <br />6 ayes 0 nays <br />OYficial Rose stated that the appitcant hed baen <br />present eerlier but hed left. <br />Motion Second: McCarthy/Warren moved to accept <br />• eso u on o. 19-81 es written. (Resol!~t1on is <br />attached). <br />6 ayes 0 nays <br />~ Motton Second: Warren/McCarthy moved to accept <br />iteso u on . 20-81 as wrf.tten. ~Resolutlon is <br />atteched). <br />6 ayes 0 nays <br />Nbtion Carrled. <br />E.T. Nughee Constructi~n <br />Company - 7624 'edgewood <br />Drive -'qevelopment revi~w - <br />4 unit residentiai building <br />Case No. 79-81, Resolution <br />No. 18-81 <br />Motton Carrled. <br />12. 7.J.B. Companles - ~704 ) <br />Highway 10, Develoament revlew - i <br />OPfice Build9ng - Case <br />No. 83 - f~soiutlon No. 19-81 <br />hWtion Carried. <br />13. Narsted b Todd Constructton <br />5159-Longvlew Lhive - Deve1- <br />opment reyiew - Two~Fam91y <br />'0-vellings - Case No. 81-81 <br />Resolutilon No. 20-81 <br />Motion Carrted <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.