1983-06-01 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~ Mounde View Planning Commiaeion June 1, 1983 ' Regulaz Meating Pag~ Four '' ---------------------------------^-----°----------------------~----- ~+., meeting tlrat there ehould be a com romise, and 9he did ~ jnot feel it wsa a compromise with ~ueE one R-1 lot, She etated thnt elnce the land ie zoned R-1, ehe feels ~t ahould atay R-1 and would only agree to hsving the tao lote next to the Bal Rae be anything other than R-r ae ehe agreed they wculd not sell ae singlu Eamily. Wee Johneon, 7630 Greenfield Avenue, etated he agraed with Ms. Olaen`e co~nente and added he felt the probleme of parking, traffic an3 davaluation of the homes were not being addreseed yet. Mayor McCarty ~uggested it would be a good compromiea if the R-1 ware extended, but he did not have a eat idea ae to how fbr it ahould be extendad. Ae far ae parking, tha problem with children treespaesing, and ac forth, he etated there could be othar remediea to Y~ndle thoae, and that he felt the baeic problem wae tha impact on the property valuea. Chairmen Mountin cl.arifie~ tha denisty, with 1/3 be~ng low densitq and 2/3 being medium denaity residential. She stated ehe present zoning and Camp Plan ere tn r.~mpliance, with'the Comp Plan baing revised in 1980, with the adaption process eaking aoma tiae. She atated the feeling among ,'~ the Cou~iesionere at th~ time of adoption waa that •~~'thie pgrticular piece of propezty was questionabla. Sha added tha Ci.ty nEede tu offer mare housing optiona to people, ae they are now low in the medit~m density range. She added the zoning couflicte have not been resolved with the Comp Pl~n, Dave Williams, 7625 Edgewood Drive, etated he thought the Comp P1an wae only Co be used ae a guide, Chairmxn Mountir: replied ~he Planning Co~ieaion ie an advieory board only, and they make their recommendatian to tMe City Councll, who makes the final decieion. Rruce Markwardt, 7635 Edgewood Drive, read a portion oE the minutea fxom Y.ha public'heaxing, ak which the owner statod he had an opportunity to se11 to a singl.e family developer, but had chosen not to. There was ~iscuAeion among the Commiasionere an~ residenre gresent of the inconeistenclee between the Comp Plan and getual zoning, and how the Comp Plan was written. The Cou~igaioners ware polled stid their opinion was thia was a good transitional dev~lopment, and they ^•. were cottcerned with the valuation o~ the homee in ` ',the area, and that thera was room for more compromise, ~-/with perhape more R-1, and higher deneity acroes from the Bel Rae.