Laserfiche WebLink
Mounde View Planning Commiseion lune 1 1983 <br />Regular Meating Page F~ve <br />-----------------------------------------------------------------^-- <br />Mr. Malmin clari£iad what ie exieting in the area, ae <br />~ far ae apartmente end duplexea and so forth, <br />Me. Olaea atated tha apartmenta were in when ehe <br />purchae~d her homa, but ehe felt that ainca the open <br />land wae zoned R-1, thaC single f,smily homes would <br />be built there. <br />Chaii~man Mountin agreed thae the arr.a ie an ieland, as <br />far ae tha eingle family homea, but added that the <br />homee will always be an ieland in that araa. <br />Mr. Williama etated he would like to make a counter <br />proposal, aa he does not feel the developer has a reaeon- <br />ible a7.eernaCive, and suggeated 14 R-1 lota and one <br />duplex, He also reviewed the traffic and parking <br />problame boiag expe.rienced presently. <br />Mr.'Johnaon atAted he did not feel the City would be <br />guarding the value ot the homea if they approved the <br />proposed devalopment, as wae addressed in a paragraph <br />Mnyor McCarty hsd read at the Council meeting, from <br />the Comp Plan regarding its giiidelines and intent.. <br />It was agreed among ~he Comniseionere that the value <br />~ o: the homes ee~mad to he tre most important iasue. <br />~ ~~, I'I8}`UY' DYCCtlYC,Y etated thatxmr~jor conce~n has been <br />parking and traffic, but he feele Edgewood is designed <br />end capable of handling as muoh trafEic as the ariginal <br />proposal would have generated, He added that the <br />parking and tresapasaing iasued could be handled. He <br />etated he felt the present Planning Commiss:Lon was <br />the best one the City had zver had. <br />~; Mayor McCarty recomm~nded tkat profeaeional expertiae <br />be sought or.i the question of the value of the homes, <br />I so that ahen the Counr_il takes ita final action, it <br />' would be based upon Che reco~endation of the Plann3ng <br />'° Commiesion; wlth an experta opinion taken into <br />i consideration. Ite added that the City needa such an <br />j opiniott to protect itaelf, in the case of a laweuit. <br />The Planning Co~isaion directed the developer to have <br />a profeasianal planner look at the pLan and determine <br />at what point thoae hemee could be harmed, and they <br />specified that I~Sidweat Planning be used, as they are ~ <br />che coneult3.ng egency on the Comp Plan, attd they hsve <br />done work for the City before, very effectively, and <br />iC wae felt the Planr~ing Commiaeion ahould require <br />they ba ueed ae it would be in the City's beat interost. <br />-~-. It waa noCed there ehould be apecific goal;r given to <br />l ;the planner. <br />a,.~ <br />Ms. Olaen etated ehe did not feel the planner would look <br />at the deneity iseue. Chairman Mountin replied that <br />