My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1983-08-03 PC Minutes
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
1983-08-03 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2009 3:51:02 PM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:24:58 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounda Y1eW Planning Commission Auguet 3, 1983 <br />Regulax Meating Page Three <br />°------^------------------°---------------------~------------------------ <br />~The Co~tiasionore queeL•ioned how much of the development <br />ould ba within the lU0' buffer zone. Technician Kampel <br />replied that it all would. <br />Mr. Fretag apologized far noC having all the information <br />available on the plan Chat the Commiaeioners were re- <br />quesC3ng , but stnted that he had not been aware that it <br />wae needed yet, and Chat they would insure it was <br />available soon, <br />It wae questi.oaed where the roof run-off would go, b~. <br />Fretag replied that the roof is a gabled roof, eo the <br />run-off would go to a11 four directiAne, and would go <br />into the rain gutkers, <br />It wae questioned how the developer plane to control <br />K~eda on the ba~1a of the pruparCy since some of it <br />ia in the Wetland. Mr. Fretag replied that 3f they <br />~re given permiesion, they would like Co go back and <br />grade tt. The Co~uisaioners also questioned how the <br />back oE the buildin~ wuuld be maintuined, in regard <br />to the vretland in baek. <br />Tecl~ioian Kempal stated he .Ee'lt normal maintenance <br />would be an accepCxble use of the wetl.and, but that <br />~driving a piece of machinar.y through therr. would be <br />` something else. He also noted that parts of the <br />code reEer to alteratiott nf the wetland and that no <br />vagetation could bQ removed, wtiich would preden~ <br />mowing eome areas. He also noted that duxing <br />conekructioa, there wauld be c~qme typa of dieruption. <br />There was a discuseion amons the Commiecionere of <br />policinp of any activity on the wetland area, i.e., <br />~he 903 contour, srith a recommendation tfiat the <br />P1a~ni.ng Camaission wculd make a rAco~endation Ce <br />grant a variance. ' <br />It wae note3 that the exiating elevatiun would be <br />leveled off dur.ing ennstructiott, w3Ch the tun-off <br />going ttorth, and tha~ the snow would be ~tacked up <br />in front of unLts 4, 5 and 6 during tha wr~nt~er, and <br />pnssibly hauled out, in case oE a heavy enowEall, <br />The Conmiissiomera queationed ~,+hat p].8ns had been mude <br />to protect the wetlund diuing conetruction. Mr. Fra- <br />tag replied that per the requirements of Rice Cxee[c, <br />two etraw balea will Ue place, and apiked into the <br />aoi1, at a cextai.n contour. <br />The Commisaionera were polled tor t[teir fealirtgs on <br />"~' the proposed development. They exprassad concer~ <br />~~t,+ith seeing mure detail ott the plan, wi1:h having <br />enough ponding area to handle tun-oEf from both <br />buildings and the fiard surPace, thaC the figurea <br />are nat ava:Liable Co o,oc; an-eite eCOrnge zeauire- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.