Laserfiche WebLink
Maun6e Visw Planning Commieeion April 4, 1964 <br />Regular Meeting <br />------------------------------------------------------- Page Two <br />--~---------_.... <br />~ Direceor Thatcher reported the Council had lookad at <br />I ; the plans for the Gale/YoeC ~3dition at their agenda <br />seeeion and did not have any probieuie witl~ it, tta <br />addad the Fire Chiaf hae approved tha cul-de-eac <br /> <br />radius, with e 5' vaxiance being requixed. ~iC~ <br />The Coamineioners reviewad propoaed Raeolution No. <br />I04-84, and noted that the garage and ahed removal '"~ <br />ehauld bn added, along wiCh the 5' variance for <br />"' <br />~ <br />aide yard eeeback, and 25' eotback, ae well ae the ~ <br /> <br />eaoamente deecribed. ~ <br />~~„ <br /> <br /> <br />The Cnmmieaionere queetioned if a hardehip etstement <br />, <br />M ~ <br />waa dieauusad by the applicant. Director thntcher ~ <br />..+°""1 <br />explained that without the variancea, tha lote would ~,,,.r~ <br />have to be emallar, and therefora would not meet s'~ <br />r"`K <br />r <br />the lot eiz~ requiremenCe, Ha added the harcdAhip <br />l <br />d <br />d <br />i <br />h <br />h <br />i ~ <br />q <br />~`, <br />e var <br />ances. <br />t <br />k <br />etatewent ehould be inc <br />u <br />e <br />w ~ <br />Chairman Mountin aleo noted the ~:ity gave the ease- ~ <br />ment up on Ardan Avenue, whieh pzeclu3ed any oii,er <br />dewel~pment arrangement. <br />Motlon Second: Andexean/Miller to adapt Reoolution <br />f~To~ zecommending approval of the Gale/Yost <br />~ addition. <br />~~`..- 8 aqas 0 nays ti~tion Csrri~d <br />Bob Balr.h iatroduced himeelf ae representing Lhe 7. Pinecrest <br />oxmer of the praparty, along with Dan Boxrud, Properties <br />o€ Shnrt-Elliot-Hendrickeon, Davelopment <br />Director ThaCCher made a preaentation of the pro- <br />posed develoFment, and reviewed the discuesion <br />that had taken place ~st the laet agende aeasion, <br />with the major isaue being whether eo rezone <br />certain parcels to I-1. <br />Mr. Boxrud made a presentacion of the proposed <br />development, showing the areas they would like <br />rezoned to I-1. He explained that if the property <br />rr.maine R-3, Raymond Avenue would have to go all <br />the way through to County Road H2, whereae if it <br />is rezoned to I-1, there would be no cut through <br />to Fi-2. He added they feel there ia very good <br />expoaure to the property, due to the location <br />of 35W ancl tlighway 10, that it would be best <br />sui.ted for induetrial and co~ercial, which <br />would not generate the heavy traffic tha.t an <br />~ R-3 development wauld. <br /> <br />