Laserfiche WebLink
Mounda Viaw Planning Commiesion Apr31 4, 1984 <br />Regular Meeting Page Four <br />-^----^-------------------------------------------------------~------- <br />~/!i~ berm, with e knock-down gate. Na added ehe ehrube <br />f j wauld be worked out with the City nngineer, ae to what <br />" would ba moet euitable, and that a11 outdour lighting <br />would be hoodad, ae requirad by code, and the ph,yeical <br />barr~er ehauld eliminate the noisa problem. <br />Chuirman Mountin reco~nanded Che Co¢m~iaeion eak £or <br />a landecaping plan to be eubmiCted and Uecome part <br />of tha development agreement, 9he added that <br />tentatively, the P2anning Commieeion would not be <br />seeing a Pinal plat, snd recommended that the buffar <br />zone be daecribed, and the landecaping pZan ba <br />eFprovod and atit:ached to the pr~apo~sZ, and r.e~ui~s <br />that the buffsr be s toGnl. vinual berrier, <br />Mr. Bor.rud noted that no platting ie being requested <br />at thia time. He also pointed out th~i: the 50-60' <br />measvrement for zhe buf£er zone wae taken by Staff <br />from eaaling a drawing, and he will work with the <br />City Engineer zo get the exact moaaurr.ment.5, which <br />he bElievea axa clooer. to 40', <br />Director Thatchar recomnendad the berm±ng ehould be <br />one of Che firat thinga the developar daes, with it <br />bel.ng a tatal vieual barrier uein$ evergreen shrubs. <br />f^. H~ nl~o r.oted they eh~uld be careful n~t to make it <br />ton high. <br />~; <br />The Coumiesioners were polled for their opinions, <br />with Co~2esioners Quick, Johneon, Miller, Lauterbach, <br />Anderaon ^nd Mountin bein~ in favnr of. tha psoposal, <br />as long as the propar berming craa put in right away, <br />with some type of grc~und cov~ring anfl vegetation. <br />Courmisaioners Sargent and Forlaun~] were not in favor <br />oi the proposal, ae they did not rxieh to rezone the <br />property, with Co~isaioner Sargent stating they <br />shcu2d stay with the Comp Plan, and he woUld pr.efer <br />going to R-4 rather than I-1, ae he felt that change <br />wna too drast:ic. Commieainner Foralund atated the <br />Planning Co~ieaion is noC in the habit of rezoning <br />unlese they know what they are rezoning for. She <br />ataeed xhe could go alon~ with the publia improve- <br />ments and roadways ae a start, but would 11ke to <br />know what is going to be put in, She also atated <br />she was concerned with going .from R-3 to I-1. <br />ChaLrman Mountin reviewed the optiona available to <br />the Commiseionere, to either recommend app.roval with <br />the cequeated rezcning, recou~end approval without <br />ehe requeated rezoning, to require a landsaaping <br />~""`y plan be submitted to the Council, along with the <br />~;~ Commisaion:~ recommendation, and to rr,.co~nend <br />phaeing of the development, with berming to be <br />part ok Phase I. <br />~ <br />~~~ <br />~ r'~ <br />~"~;+~ <br />~~,.., ~ <br />~"'i~ ,l <br />~~ <br />