Laserfiche WebLink
.~~~'1~T' ~YL .. <br />Mounde Viaw Planning Comnisaion April 3, 1985 <br />Regul,ar Meaking Page Thsee <br />-------------------------------------------------------~-~--~--------- <br />~ehowing wk.ere Che bonue wae given, and also etated <br />that a varian~e was given whr.re one wae not required, <br />100 percent of the deneiky granted was given to lots <br />othRr l:han thoue Chat sre in question at thta time, <br />and they could <-,m,,.nd the area to be over three acrea, <br />and could then gi~+e a deneity bonus for aquare footage <br />or frontage, at whioh time they could meet the code <br />without a variance. <br />Mr. Haae, of Marv Andereon Construction, reported that <br />in going through his files, he had come acroae a Staff <br />report from February 1994, which raised questions <br />about what wae required. He added that he fe.ela very <br />strongly about the d.eneity leeway and reminded the <br />Co~nissioners that they werp r.eque3ting to go from 16 <br />iinits of- 8 double homPS, to 14 eingle family homes, <br />which they feol would "ne an asset to the area. <br />Chairman Mountin replied thae they do not want to change <br />the 75' frontage requiremenY., especially since eha does <br />not feel that by having the narrower lot the price of <br />the homes would decrease considerably, to what would.be <br />coneidered affordable housing, <br />Director Thatcher b.riefly reviewed the Staff report <br />~"~ of February 14. 198~, which Mr. Haas had mentioned, <br />~!and stated he needed more time to research it. He <br />also pointed out they are now coneiderin~ going to the <br />middle of the etreeC fox measur,ing. ' <br />Eir'. kaae ataCed they huve not been able to sell on~e <br />twin home in Mounds View in the. past year. Ae added <br />they submikted their request five monthe ago and <br />would like to have the Ylanning Cammies3on take <br />action on it tonight, so they may proceed one way or <br />the other. <br />Director Thatcher stated Staff can recommend only <br />giving a 10 percent bonas, and he reviewed the propaeed <br />resolution, <br />Chsirman Mountin asked that the resolueion include <br />that Che uarrower lot eize does not provide sn af£ordable <br />houeing opportunity in the coffinunity. <br />Motion Spcond: Miller/Foralund to adopt Resolution No. <br />-, recommending denial to the Council of Case <br />146-84 for M. H. Anderaon Construction. <br />7 ayea 0 nays Motion Caxried <br />~Mr. Haas indicated they would like to appeal the <br />decision Co thc Citp Council. Director Thatchez ~ <br />stated he would inform them when it would be <br />presented to the Council. <br />~... . . <br />