My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1985-11-06 PC Minutes
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
1985-11-06 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2009 3:46:41 PM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:25:48 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~, . . ,,. <br />I4oundA View Planning Canunisel.an November 6, 1925 <br />ReguZar Mt~eting Paqe Two <br />_°__-____~__~__.e~~..-_~_^-~---^°_-°____'~__^___--__._ _......_-___,.~.,____°____ <br />Hillyer axplained tha mai.n eign ie on Grovaland <br />,x„, ad and ano!:her on Hiqhwap 10, tIe etat~ad 'ne has Ewo <br />separato buaineeees on the prape~ty, and he Would like <br />to maintaln the pedeetal eign and go to the other end <br />of the lot and put ap the exletinq eign and make it <br />permanen6 nn a mount. <br />Chaisman Mountin stated ahe agrr,ad the code ia poti <br />alear, she pointed out th•>,t the hiatory hae been to <br />not allow more than one aign per buaineu~ lot, and <br />gave Mounda View 3quare as an example, where thece is <br />one pedeetal siqn, then each bueinaes has their ewn <br />fiueh-mnunt sign, which is the intent of the ordinance. <br />3ha addad that many oities are eliminating peder~tal <br />aigns completely~ and going with fluoh-mount. <br />Diractor Tk~atcher explained Mr, Hillyer has been <br />very cooparative ir~ trying to work with the City and <br />abide by the codee. He also rov,iewed sectiono of <br />the code and how they could ba interpreted. <br />Mr. Riillyer. asked if it would Ua aoneidered difEerently <br />if tha eign wae mounted on a base, and explained he <br />hae alraady had a pole mount made. Ho adde3 that if <br />__the Plar.~ing Cc::unis~sl.on s~ill allow hin tp e•=ect his <br />'~ign, he would be willing to take it down if they <br />~,ater felt it was an eye sore, and he would be <br />wiiling to put that into writing. <br />llirector Thatcher pointed out the codp does addresa <br />ground signa, and there are many ways to loak ah. the <br />ordinance and interpret it. He added they could <br />passiblp a,Llow br~th pedestal and ground signs on a <br />piece of pnoperty, <br />Mr. Hillyer atated he could not nf.re.r,tively advertise <br />both the bueinesaes on une ai.gn. <br />Chairman kIountin ranindad the Commiseioners they must <br />aonsider the nuieance tactors, eafety faatnra, and tha <br />Y.ueinoaeman's right to advertise liie husiness. <br />It wae the concensus of the Planning Commtssion to <br />discuae ~he i,saue further at the next agenda sessiott. <br />It wae noted th3t Mr. Hillyer hae not applied for a <br />code appeal. They a1HO advised Mr. Hillyer of the <br />time that would be involved if they were to change <br />the code. <br />I pirector Thatcher Advised that the City could i,seue <br />~--~+9x. Hillyer a temporary permit at this time, but they <br />I~uld not 6e abJ.a to after the oroposed code reviaian ~ <br />ich bans tem~orary aigns goas into effect after <br />, January 1, 1986. <br />i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.