Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission February 16, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br /> <br />City Code must be examined, and there is always the possibility of a reverse vote. He explained <br />that the Commission might not like an item they are voting on, however, if it is allowed by the <br />City Code, oftentimes, they do not have the luxury of denying it, which is one of the difficult <br />positions the Planning Commission faces. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated Page 8 of Eller Media’s proposal indicates the location of the <br />proposed billboards on the golf course. He stated the spacing slightly exceeds the 1,000-foot <br />minimum requirement, and in fact, the last billboard proposed on this property is in very close <br />proximity to the Sysco property line. He stated this billboard would impact the application that <br />Sysco and DeLite Outdoor Advertising have made with the City, which would be before the <br />Planning Commission at their March 15 meeting. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated that if the sign locations are approved as proposed, Sysco <br />would be limited to one billboard on their property. He stated it appears there could be room to <br />shift the signs on the golf course property, to allow for a second sign on the Sysco property, <br />however, this possibility has not yet been fully researched. He stated this was something that <br />could be examined. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland inquired if there was any language in the new ordinance that limits the <br />distance a billboard can be placed, with respect to a property line. He stated this appeared to be <br />the issue with regard to Sysco, in terms of a conflict with the property line. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated he was not aware of any provision that specifically addresses <br />the distance from a property line. He noted there may be language in the Sign Code that <br />indicates a specific requirement, however, this would be no greater than 30 feet, if there was any <br />reference, at all. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland stated it would appear language of this nature should be added, to <br />prevent a conflict such as this. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson agreed. He stated that if there was a restriction within 500 feet of an <br />adjacent property line, they would not have this problem, however, this would probably result in <br />the loss of one sign on the golf course. He suggested they require 500 feet on each side of the <br />property line. He added that if Sysco was unable to place two billboards on their property as a <br />result of this requirement, it would be unfortunate, however, it would be the same situation for <br />the City. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson stated he would agree with this. He indicated however, the City <br />Council has already overruled the Planning Commission with regard to the signs, and are <br />proposing six billboards to generate revenue, which could be reduced to five, in order to allow <br />Sysco to have two billboards. He stated the City would see no financial benefit from this, except <br />through the permitting process, and would lose this income. <br />