Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission February 16, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 11 <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Berke stated he understood this, however, another consideration is that Sysco has <br />been a good neighbor and a taxpayer in the City, and should be treated fairly. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson advised that this would be equally fair to all parties. <br /> <br />Commissioner Laube stated this Planning Commission should approach this situation in this <br />manner. He pointed out that when a conditional use permit is granted, it affects all of the <br />citizens, and this action would set precedence for the next proposal that comes forward. He <br />stated the requirements that apply to the City are the same for Sysco, and now that Sysco has <br />filed an application, and this conflict has arisen, it must be examined. He stated whatever means <br />they utilize to resolve this must be consistent for all parties, and if they approve this matter, as <br />proposed, they would not be able to do this. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson pointed out that Sysco would then come before the City to request a <br />variance. Commissioner Stevenson added that they might then have to consider a lesser spacing <br />requirement. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson reiterated that they could require the signs be set back 500 feet from the <br />property lines. Commissioner Stevenson explained that they would not need to be this specific, <br />because allowing the two Sysco billboards would not interfere with any other billboards. He <br />stated Ordinance 644 and 637 are applicable only to this specific area, and these billboards. He <br />indicated they would not have to amend the Code, but rather, could be very specific that the <br />signs be 500 feet from the property lines, in this case. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson stated a 500-foot property line distance restriction would effectively limit <br />Sysco to only one sign, therefore, it would not necessarily assist in this situation. Commissioner <br />Hegland pointed out that such a restriction would be consistent for everyone, in that the City <br />would lose one billboard, as well. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson stated the northernmost sign on the Interstate 35W corridor is outside of <br />the City’s jurisdiction, in terms of the sign spacing requirement. Commissioner Hegland advised <br />that is would still have to be 500 feet from that property line, however, if they were losing one <br />sign, there should be sufficient room for this. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson commented that rather than losing a sign, the City would probably <br />place them closer together. He inquired at what distance from the property lines the two <br />billboards on the Sysco property could be placed, and still meet the 1,000-foot spacing <br />requirement. <br /> <br />Mr. Seipp stated the frontage of this property was between 1,200 and 1,300 feet, therefore, both <br />signs would have to be within 100 to 150 feet from either lot line. He indicated that almost any <br />restriction from the property line would limit Sysco to one sign. <br />