05-03-2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission May 3, 2000 Regular Meeting Page 10 as a legislative body. The Council must work with the specifics of the particular case, and not make broad policy decisions. The third point pertains to the neighborhood reaction to a proposal. The Council is required to examine both the law and the fact, and while it is definitely important, the Council is unable to base their decision solely upon the neighborhood input. The Council must attempt to understand and appreciate the concerns of the residents, and respect their right to dispute a proposal that would directly affect the future of their property. The Council must seek community involvement. The fourth point relates to the necessity of keeping a clear record of the public hearing, to be the record of the evidence presented, and to document the reasons for the finding of fact. The finding of fact must be based upon the record, and within the legal standards of the City Ordinance. The record is also necessary to indicate that the Council has fulfilled its role as judge, and that it has satisfied its position in regard to the law and fact. Community Development Director Jopke provided the Commission with materials he obtained from the Minnesota League of Cities Risk Management Seminar, which reflected the issues brought forward in the video presentation. He indicated the League of Minnesota Cities was a very good resource, and as information is provided, it would be presented to the Commission. He encouraged the Commission members to attend these courses as they become available, noting that he has set aside funds in the Community Development Department budget specifically for Planning Commission training. Community Development Director Jopke stated he believed the video had done a good job of presenting the key points pertaining to dealing with the specific facts of the case, and having a clear record of the hearing and a basis for the findings of fact. He indicated the Planning Commission does a good job in terms of considering resolutions of approval or denial based upon the findings of fact, and it is good to remind themselves of these points. Chairperson Peterson stated some of the training courses the Planning Commission members have attended address these issues as well. He explained there were many legal issues pertaining to variances, conditional use permits, due process for applicants and residents. He stated these issues could not be handled appropriately without some training in these matters, and these courses have been very valuable. 9. Staff Reports / Items of Information A. Previous Council Action Community Development Director Jopke stated the Comprehensive Plan has been submitted to all of the surrounding communities. He indicated staff requested comments in April, however, no comments were received, and the Comprehensive Plan has now been officially forwarded to the Metropolitan Council for their review and comment, which could take up to 60 days. He