Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission May 17, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 12 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson inquired if the 10 by 10-foot shed in the woods would remain on the <br />property. Planning Associate Ericson stated it was his understanding that it would. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson inquired if the total storage area on the property would be increased <br />from 1250 square feet to 1350 square feet. Mr. Stampfle stated yes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson inquired regarding the condition of the shed. Mr. Stampfle indicated it <br />was approximately 55 years old, and its removal would not represent a major loss, however, he <br />currently utilizes it to store his lawn mower and other lawn equipment. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson inquired if it would be necessary to allow the shed to remain, in light <br />of the proposed 1,250 square foot garage. Commissioner Hegland requested clarification <br />regarding the maximum amount of accessory space allowed on the lot. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson advised that the combined area of the shed and the proposed garage <br />would be 1,350 square feet, and the maximum area allowed was 1,400 square feet. <br />Commissioner Hegland stated the applicant should be permitted to keep the shed, as he would be <br />within this requirement. Planning Associate Ericson added the subject lot is approximately 1 <br />acre in size, and the existing shed, which is located deep in the woods, is not visible. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kaden inquired if a previous proposal for an oversized garage in the same area <br />was denied because it would have been larger than the house. He pointed out that the applicant’s <br />garage would be approximately 100 square feet smaller than the house. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the previous applicant, Tim Skeet, had requested a 1,400 <br />square foot garage, however, the house on that property was approximately 500 to 600 square <br />feet in size. He explained that the issue was with regard to the proportion of garage in <br />comparison to the house. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson advised that the Planning Commission does not approve or deny a <br />conditional use permit request, but rather makes a recommendation to the City Council, at which <br />level, the decision is made. He stated the matter before the Commission at this time is the <br />resolution staff has drafted which recommends approval of the conditional use permit. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stevenson/Miller. To Approve Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Resolution No. 617-00, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to <br />Allow for a 1,248 Square-foot Oversized Garage at 2832 Woodale Drive; Mounds View <br />Planning Case No. CU00-004, as corrected. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 6 Nays – 0 The motion carried. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated this item has been scheduled for a public hearing at the May <br />22, 2000 City Council Meeting.