05-17-2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission May 17, 2000 Regular Meeting Page 19 Planning Associate Ericson stated this could certainly be added to indicate “WHEREAS, The Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the proposed 1,920 square feet of outdoor storage satisfies the dimensional requirements.” He stated they could also reference the site plan, however, these dimensions were an approximate estimate as well. MOTION/SECOND: Kaden/Stevenson. To Approve Mounds View Planning Commission Resolution 619-00, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to Allow for a Fenced, Outdoor Storage Enclosure at 4749 Old Highway 8; Mounds View Planning Case No. CU00-006, as Amended to Add a Clause after the Fourth WHEREAS Clause to Indicate “WHEREAS, The Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the proposed 1,920 square feet of outdoor storage satisfies the dimensional requirements,” and to Include a Clause on the Second Page of the Resolution to Indicate “NOW Therefore, be it further resolved that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward notification of this resolution of approval to the Mounds View Chief of Police for his information.” Ayes – 6 Nays – 0 The motion carried. Planning Associate Ericson stated this item has been scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council on May 22, 2000. 9. Planning Case No. CU00-007 Property Involved: 2251 Oakwood Drive Public Hearing, Discussion and Consideration of Resolution 620-00, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a 1,150 Square-foot Oversized Garage. Applicant: Kenneth Waste The applicant was present: Planning Associate Ericson gave the staff report as follows: The applicant, Kenneth Waste is before the Commission to request conditional use permit to construct a 1,150 square-foot garage on his property located at 2251 Oakwood Drive. The proposed garage would replace the existing single-stall garage that is in need of replacement. Planning Associate Ericson provided the Commission with a photograph of the subject property, and the applicant’s truck, which was parked in the driveway. He stated he was uncertain there was sufficient room in the existing garage to park the vehicle, and therefore, the need for a larger garage was very apparent.