Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission May 17, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 20 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the subject lot is 12,000 square feet, slightly larger than the <br />minimum lot size allowed in the City. He indicated the property is improved with a one and one <br />half story home, which has been fully expanded at the upper level of the front of the house. The <br />existing detached garage would be removed, and the proposed 1,150 square-foot garage would <br />be attached to the house. There would be no issue with regard to encroachment into the setback. <br />The site plan indicates that there would be a possible setback of eight feet from the property line, <br />and the dimensions of the garage are proposed to be 23 feet by 50 feet. There is a shed on the <br />property, which would be removed, and the proposed garage would replace both the existing <br />garage and the existing shed. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated staff has reviewed the conditional use permit criteria, and has <br />addressed those in the staff report. He explained that staff believes the existence of the present <br />garage, and the fact that it needs to be replaced, demonstrates the need for this use. He indicated <br />that the Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and improvement of properties. He <br />advised that the size of the proposed garage would be less than the maximum level allowed by <br />the City, as the Code allows for 1,400 square feet with a conditional use permit, and the <br />applicant is requesting 1,150 square feet. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the proposed garage would not appear to be out of place in <br />terms of its proportion to the size of the house. He explained that it would not be larger than the <br />house, and it would be oriented sideways, so that the view from the street would be one-third <br />garage and two-thirds home. He stated it was anticipated that by attaching the garage to the <br />house and maintaining a uniform appearance, the results would be quite attractive. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson indicated staff has examined the dimensions of the lot and the size of <br />the house in comparison to the proposed garage. He stated staff feels comfortable with this <br />proposal, in that the adverse affects appear to be minimal. He pointed out however, the <br />neighbors would be looking at the proposed garage, as opposed to the existing garage, which is <br />smaller, and this would be a significant change. He added that this item differs from the <br />previous applications in that the lot is smaller and does contain the same extent of wooded <br />coverage, mature trees, and privacy fencing, which is a consideration. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated this was a public hearing, and notification has been sent to <br />properties within 350 feet of the subject property. He provided the Commission with a location <br />map, which indicated the properties that received notification, adding that a significant number <br />of residents were notified in this regard. He indicated staff has prepared Resolution 620-00, <br />which recommends City Council approval of the conditional use permit with stipulations similar <br />to those of the previous conditional use permit resolutions. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson opened the floor for public comment. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated staff received a telephone call from a neighbor who remained <br />anonymous, and did not indicate where his property was located in relation to the subject