Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission June 21, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 26 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated this is how this matter is currently set forth in the Code. He <br />explained that the Code states that a 952 square foot garage may be configured to the property <br />owner’s specifications, and there is no restriction on the number of doors, however, once the <br />structure exceeds 952 square feet, a Conditional Use Permit is required. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson stated he was aware of at least one four-car garage, however, it is angled <br />on the lot, does not face the street, and there is no wide driveway involved. He stated the <br />property owner must make a very sharp turn to access the rear stall, however, this appears to be <br />acceptable in the event that four stalls are needed. He stated Conditional Use Permit process <br />would be an appropriate means to address this. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller inquired if the Commission was to consider the driveway widths and curb <br />cut issues as well. Planning Associate Ericson stated the driveway issue has been addressed in <br />the recent revision to the Code, which states that a property owner is allowed to have a driveway <br />as wide as the garage. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thomas inquired what types of issues would come forward in a case where there <br />is a four-car garage that is only 952 square feet, and the property owner desired to increase the <br />accessory storage space and construct a shed in the back yard. She inquired if there would be a <br />problem as a result of a garage that exceeds 35 feet in width. Commissioner Johnson stated this <br />could potentially limit access to the back yard. <br /> <br />6. Staff Reports / Items of Information <br /> <br />A. Previous Council Actions <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated staff has received a preliminary list of comments <br />from the Metropolitan Council with regard to the Comprehensive Plan. He indicated this is part <br />of the Metropolitan Council’s completeness review, which purpose is to determine if the City <br />has developed a complete plan. He advised that in the area of aviation, the City is required to <br />incorporate the current legislation and agreement that recently occurred, to ensure this language <br />is reflected in the Comprehensive Plan. He stated the Local Water Surface Management Plan <br />must also be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan, and this particular item was scheduled <br />to come back before the Planning Commission at their next meeting on July 5th, at which time, <br />the City Engineer would present the latest version of the Plan. He indicated additional <br />information pertaining to sanitary sewers is required to be included in the Comprehensive Plan <br />as well, and staff is attempting to provide this information to the Metropolitan Council so that <br />they may proceed with their review. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated the Highway 10 Steering Committee would hold <br />a community meeting on July 11th, at 7:00 p.m., in Council Chambers. He indicated the Steering <br />Committee would present the framework for an action plan and priorities that have been <br />developed for issues concerning Highway 10, which range from safety and community identity