Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission September 6, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 20 <br /> <br /> <br />bit of a bend so the bikers aren’t going quite as fast at that moment and the cars would also need <br />to slow if there was a bend added. <br /> <br />Truman Howell, the architect representing the applicant, said he had no problem with jogging <br />the trail and roadway to make it safer. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson asked if drainage from the site would be handled through natural gravity. <br /> <br />Mr. Hall indicated that the same grades will be maintained as are now in place. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson asked if the elevations are such that a gravity flow system would work. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jopke indicated that the gravity flow system should work <br />properly. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Johnson/Miller to approve Resolution No. 635-00, a Resolution <br />Recommending Approval of Development Review for the Mermaid Planned Unit Development <br />requested by Dan Hall, 2200 Highway 10 with the required stipulations. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 6 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br /> <br />10. Planning Case No. 560-99 <br /> <br />Property Involved: 2670 County Road I <br />Discussion and Consideration of Resolution No. 636-00, a Resolution Recommending Approval of <br />an Extension of a Conditional Use Permit for an Assisted Living Senior Residential Facility at 2670 <br />County Road I <br />Applicant: MSP Real Estate <br /> <br />Milo Pinkerton, representing MSP Real Estate, Inc., the applicant, was not present. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson gave the Staff report as follows: <br /> <br />On September 13, 1999, the City Council approved Resolution 5345 which approved of a <br />conditional use permit for a 46-room, two-level assisted living senior residential facility at 2670 <br />County Road I. The applicant, MSP Real Estate, Inc., has not yet commenced construction of <br />the approved facility, and the site remains unimproved at this point. <br /> <br />Section 1125.01, Subd. 3f of the City Code states that “Whenever, within one year after granting a <br />conditional use permit, the work as permitted by the permit shall not have been completed, then such <br />permit shall become null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to complete the <br />work has been granted by the City Council. Such extension shall be requested, in writing, and filed <br />with the City Clerk-Administrator at least thirty (30) days before the expiration of the original <br />conditional use permit.” In addition, the Code states that a good faith attempt shall have been made <br />by the applicant to complete the work allowed for in the CUP. <br />