Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission September 6, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 21 <br /> <br /> <br />Milo Pinkerton has requested such an extension, citing economic and financial factors as the basis <br />for the delay. He indicates that a one-year extension would give them enough time to begin <br />construction. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson stated unless the Planning Commission feels strongly to the contrary, Staff is <br />recommending approval of Resolution 636-00, a Resolution Recommending Approval of the <br />One-Year Extension for the Conditional Use Permit to Construct a 46-room, Two-Story, <br />Assisted Living Senior Residential Facility at 2670 County Road I. <br /> <br />Commissioner Berke said that the management group proposed for this facility was closed down <br />in Wisconsin due to a staffing problem. He explained that the management group had told the <br />Planning Commission that they would be adequately staffed. He expressed a desire to revisit the <br />development plan if the extension is granted. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson indicated that the Commission could readdress the conditions of the project. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson stated that the aspects of the plan should be revisited to make sure <br />everyone is clear as to what they are promising versus what they will do. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson indicated that they should review the front door/lobby design as it opens <br />to Mounds View Drive. He indicated he believes that there should be a desk where you sign out <br />or a monitor so no one wanders out. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson asked if they needed to revise the resolution to add the conditions to <br />revisit the front desk check out and level of staffing. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson indicated that if they don’t add the condition to the resolution and they grant the <br />extension it could be built tomorrow as originally proposed. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson advised that the resolution could be revised to add the phrase “subject to the <br />applicant reapplying for and obtaining approval of a development review.” Then all of those <br />issues can be looked at again. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Peterson/Berke to approve the revised Resolution 636-00, a Resolution <br />Recommending Approval of the One-Year Extension for the Conditional Use Permit to <br />Construct a 46-room, Two-Story, Assisted Living Senior Residential Facility at 2670 County <br />Road I subject to the applicant reapplying for and obtaining approval of a development review. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 6 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson advised that this will be considered by the Council on September 11, 2000. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />11. Staff Reports / Items of Information <br />