Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission September 6, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Miller/Stevenson to approve Resolution 632-00, a Resolution Denying the <br />Variance Request of Jim and Judy Trapp to Construct a Gazebo one foot from the North <br />Property Line of 8018 Sunnyside Road. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 6 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br /> <br />7. Planning Case No. VR00-007 <br /> <br />Property Involved: 7664 Greenfield Avenue <br />Discussion and Consideration of Resolution No. 633-00, a Resolution Approving a Parking Lot <br />Setback Variance <br />Applicant: Tony Mezzenga <br /> <br /> <br />Tony Mezzenga, the applicant representing the property owner Ernest Gustafson, was present. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson gave the Staff report as follows: <br /> <br />Tony Mezzenga, representing the property owner Ernest Gustafson, is requesting approval of a <br />variance to construct a small, split-level office building on the undeveloped lot at the southwest <br />corner of County Road I and Greenfield Avenue. The variance is requested for reduced parking <br />lot and building setbacks. <br /> <br />This 13,068 square-foot property is zoned B-3, Highway Business. The size of the lot, however, <br />does present practical difficulties in terms of what can be developed, which has left the lot up to <br />this point unimproved. <br /> <br />County Road I is the second-most traveled roadway in the City. 1997 traffic counts show as <br />many as 8,700 vehicles use this part of County Road I on a daily basis and projections are such <br />that the volume is expected to increase as development progresses east of Interstate 35W. <br /> <br />This lot borders commercial property to the west (Tom Thumb and a Laundromat), high density <br />residential to the east, and low density residential to the south and north. The proposed office <br />use is consistent with the B-3 zoning designation and is a less intensive use which would fit well <br />into the predominately residential surroundings. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson advised that Staff has met with Mr. Mezzenga and Mr. Gustafson on numerous <br />occasions in an effort to draft a site plan that could be developed for the property. The size of <br />the lot and the extent of the setback requirements however are impediments toward that goal. He <br />presented the required setbacks in a B-3 district, noting the applicant has submitted a site plan <br />for a 3,480 square-foot split-level office building with 2,975 square feet of usable office space. <br />For that much area, the Code requires provision of 20 parking stalls. To construct a building of <br />that size and a parking lot to accommodate 20 vehicles, variances would need to be approved to <br />reduce the side and rear building setbacks from 20 feet to 10 feet and to reduce the parking lot <br />setbacks from 30 feet and 20 feet to 4 feet and 15 feet.