Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission September 6, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br /> <br /> <br />Planner Ericson explained that after reviewing the documentation and taking public testimony, <br />Staff is asking the Planning Commission to direct Staff to draft a resolution approving the <br />variance either as requested or as compromised, or to draft a resolution denying the variance <br />request. If the Planning Commission so chooses to approve the variance, Staff has included a <br />draft resolution that can be acted upon as is or with any modifications as deemed necessary. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. <br /> <br />Herbert Zworn of 7660 Greenfield Avenue explained that his property would be the most <br />affected by the development of the lot. He then explained that he currently spends several hours <br />a month maintaining his property due to trash and other debris that is thrown in his yard by <br />people who cut through his lot and the undeveloped lot to get to Tom Thumb. <br /> <br />Mr. Zworn explained that there is an additional problem along the back of his property because <br />Tom Thumb does not maintain the area around the privacy fence that separates his lot from the <br />Tom Thumb lot. He indicated that he has many problems with Tom Thumb and feels another <br />commercial building will only increase the problems he has to deal with because the commercial <br />property owners/developers do not maintain their property. <br /> <br />Mr. Zworn indicated that his front windows look directly out into the vacant lot and a two-story <br />structure will obstruct his view. He also indicated that he would be looking at an eight-foot <br />privacy fence out of one-half of the front window. <br /> <br />Mr. Zworn asked the Planning Commission to restudy this project and implement other policies <br />or designs, or vacate the idea because he feels that the property owner/developer and the <br />Commission are attempting to put a “square peg in a round hole.” <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson told Mr. Zworn that Tom Thumb should be working with him to alleviate <br />foot traffic across the property. <br /> <br />A member of the audience stated that only half of the people within 350 feet were notified. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson inquired of Staff as to whom and what addresses the notices were mailed. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson advised of the number of properties on each adjacent street that were notified of <br />the public hearing. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson stated that the foot traffic to and from Tom Thumb should not be <br />happening. He told Mr. Zworn that the City and the developer in this case do not want to make <br />his situation worse and, in his opinion, developing the lot and placing a fence around the <br />property would prohibit foot traffic to and from Tom Thumb and, thus, improve the situation Mr. <br />Zworn is in. <br /> <br />Colleen Olson of 7641 Edgewood Drive stated that she is not directly adjacent to the property <br />but she objects to the variance because her neighborhood is already very congested and <br />developing this lot will add to that congestion. She said she feels that this variance would give