My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Resolution 478-96
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Resolutions
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
Planning Commission Resolution 478-96
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2007 3:01:23 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:21:34 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COl\'IMISSION <br />RESOLUTION NO. 478-96 <br /> <br />CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING A REDUCTION IN THE REAR SETBACK <br />REQUIREMENT FROM 30 FEET TO 10 FEET FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A THREE <br />SEASON PORCH AT 8480 PLEASANT VIEW DRIVE; PLANNING CASE NO. 457-96 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of Ronald <br />L. Gardner to allow a 10 foot rear setback where 30 feet is required for the construction of a <br />three season porch at 8480 Pleasant View Drive; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, this property is in the R-l single family residential district and is located on a <br />cul-de-sac which causes the lot to be irregular in shape; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the criteria used to evaluate variance <br />requests; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the applicant presented a hardship statement to the Planning Commission <br />stating that the lot is irregular in shape which has caused the house to be constructed closer to the <br />rear lot line than is typical and which makes it difficult to add improvements to the rear of the <br />house; and that three season porches are a typical improvement in this neighborhood and allowing <br />for the porch to be built would not be granting a special privilege; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to this property in that <br />the lot is irregular in shape, and required that the house be built closer to the rear lot line than is <br />typical for this district; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the <br />applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district in that three season <br />porches are a typical improvement in this neighborhood and elsewhere in the R-1 single family <br />residential district; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the <br />applicant in that the proposed location of the porch is necessitated by the location of the existing <br />house, the existing sliding glass door, and the floor plan for the dining room where the porch will <br />attach to the house; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special <br />privilege that is denied by this Title to owners or other lands, structures or buildings in the same <br />district in that three season porches are a typical improvement for single family residences; and, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.