Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Resolution 480-96 <br />September 18, 1996 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />The applicant has testified of the difficulty encountered by his clients in trying to find <br />vacant property which would allow development of a church near to where most of the <br />church members live. The church congregation includes members who live in the Mounds <br />View area. There appears to be a demonstrated need for the use. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does hereby make the following findings of fact <br />regarding this conditional use permit request with respect to the criteria set forth in Section <br />1125.01 Subd. 3.b. for the review of conditional use permits: <br /> <br />The criteria are noted below, and have been grouped to avoid repetitive findings. <br /> <br />(1) The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and other <br />public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. <br /> <br />(7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. <br /> <br />(8) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary facilities have been or will be <br />provided. <br /> <br />The New Apostolic Church proposed to hold Sunday School at 8:45-9:30 AM and two <br />Sunday church services: 10:00-11:00 AM and 5:00-6:00 PM. The Church also holds a <br />Wednesday evening service from 8:00-9:00 PM. The current congregation is <br />approximately 55 people. Because the use is a church, rather than residential homes, it is <br />not anticipated to create a demand on parks or schools. Both water and sewer service <br />adequate to support this use is available to this site. The site is served by two streets, <br />County Road H and Pleasant View Drive. Given the limited number of services, and the <br />size of the congregation, the amount of traffic is anticipated to be low and will occur on <br />weekends or evenings rather than during peak commute times. <br /> <br />The City Engineer has reviewed the applicant's drainage proposal and has indicated that <br />the rate of runoff should not be a problem and the grass treatment areas will provide <br />sufficient water quality treatment. Drainage will now be directed to County Road Hand <br />will flow through grassed areas to allow sediments to percolate before runoff water leaves <br />the site. Recommendations from the City Engineer that the grass treatment areas be <br />seeded rather than sodded are addressed as a contingency in the resolution on the <br />development review. The Rice Creek Watershed District has indicated to staff that a <br />permit from them is not required. The proposal meets the criteria (1), (7) and (8) stated <br />above. <br />