My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Resolution 510-97
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Resolutions
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Planning Commission Resolution 510-97
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2007 3:01:20 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:21:53 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION <br />RESOLUTION NO. 510-97 <br /> <br />CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING A REDUCTION IN THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH <br />REQUIREMENT FROM 50 FEET TO 34 FEET TO ALLOW FOR A ZERO LOT LINE <br />SUBDIVISION FOR 7720 - 7730 SILVER LAKE ROAD; <br />PLANNING CASE NO. 485-97 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of Glenn <br />Karlen to permit a 34 foot lot width where 50 feet is required to allow for a zero lot line <br />subdivision at 7720 - 7730 Silver Lake Road; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, this property is zoned R-2, Single- and Two-Family Residential District and <br />is legally described as: <br /> <br />Lot 1, Block 1, Karlen's Addition <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents associated <br />with this request: <br /> <br />I. Planning Application <br />2. Zoning Map <br />3, Site Plan <br />4, Letter from the Applicant <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the applicant presented a hardship statement to the Planning Commission <br />stating that his intent was to convert the existing rental twinhome into owner-occupied dwelling <br />units; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the <br />applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district ill that there are <br />several other lots in the vicinity that have zero lot line status; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the <br />applicant in that the twinhome was constmcted prior to the adoption of the zero lot line <br />requirements and at the time met all of the applicable requirements; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special <br />privilege that is denied by this Title to owners or other lands, stmctures or buildings in the same <br />district ill that many of the twinhomes in the area are also owner-occupied with zero lot lines; <br />and, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.