My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Resolution 612-00
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Resolutions
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
Planning Commission Resolution 612-00
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2007 3:01:18 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:24:47 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Resolution 612-00 <br />Magoris Variance <br />April 5, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, a public hearing was held Wednesday, March 15,2000, with regard to this <br />variance request; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal <br />Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria, of which all must be <br />satisfied, in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission <br />finds that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View <br />Municipal Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient hardship with regard to the property <br />located at 2741 Hodges Lane to warrant the approval of a variance for an 18-foot front yard, <br />corner-lot setback for a proposed garage addition, and makes the following findings offact <br />related to its decision: <br /> <br />1. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to 2741 Hodges Lane which do not <br />apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity in that the property is a <br />corner lot and oddly shaped, which makes it difficult to meet typical setback requirements, <br /> <br />2. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of <br />rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this <br />Title in that the east side of the proposed garage addition would have varying setback <br />requirements. <br /> <br />3. The variance request is the result offactors over which the applicant has had no control. <br /> <br />4. Granting a variance to allow for the 18-foot front yard, corner-lot setback would allow the <br />applicant to better utilize the property yet would not confer upon the property owner a <br />special privilege denied to others in the same district due to the unique nature of the lot's <br />configuration. <br /> <br />5. The Planning Commission finds that the requested 18-foot setback is the minimum <br />variance that would alleviate the applicant's hardship yet would still result in a 24-foot <br />setback to the street from the rear of the garage. <br /> <br />6. Granting a variance for a reduced front yard, corner-lot setback for the proposed garage <br />addition would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other <br />property in the same zone, <br /> <br />7. An 18-foot setback would not impair a supply oflight or increase congestion, nor would it <br />increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or diminish property values. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.