Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View pity Council December 11, 1989 <br />Regular Meet ng Pa a Seven <br />------------ ---------------------------------------------g--------------- <br />Mayor Hankne noted this had been reviewed by the <br />Council at t eir last agenda session. <br />Motion/Secon <br />rize the May <br />for the Coun <br />of the City. <br />5 ayes <br />Mr. Minetor <br />agency agree <br />act as the C' <br />on the City' <br />struction, i <br />it had someh <br />MnDOT has re <br />at this time. <br />Blanchard/Quick to approve and autho- <br />r to sign the supplemental agreement <br />y Road I contractor delay, on behalf <br />nays <br />xplained each year the City signs an <br />ent with MnDOT, directing MnDOT to <br />ty's agent in accepting federal aid <br />behalf for .road and bridge con- <br />provements and maintenance. However, <br />w been missed for this past year, so <br />uested the agreement be executed <br />Motion/Secon Blanchard/Paone to approve Reso- <br />lution No. 2575, approving the agency agreement <br />with MnDOT, and waive the reading. <br />5 ayes ~0 nays <br />• Councilmemb <br />lution No. <br />placed on p <br />considered <br />not knowing <br />until after <br />r Blanchard reviewed proposed Reso- <br />569, which calls for signs to be <br />operty that planning action is being <br />~, to alleviate the problem of people <br />when something is going to be changed <br />the fact. <br />Motion/Seco d: Blanchard/Wuori to approve Reso- <br />lution No. 569, establishing policy on the <br />placement o planning signs, and waive the reading. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />There was c nsiderable discussion on the proposed <br />resolution efore the vote was taken. Concern was <br />expressed b Councilmember Quick on the amount of <br />deposit bei g required not being enough to cover <br />the cost of metal signs, if they need to be re- <br />placed. <br />Motion/Second: Quick/Paone to amend the previous <br />motion to specify the signs would be metal, and <br />require a $100 deposit for each sign. <br />2 ayes 3 nays <br />Councilmem ers Blanchard, Wuori and Mayor Hankner <br />voted gain t the motion, stating they felt a $100 <br />deposit wa too high for single family homes and <br />Motion Carried <br />17. Consideration <br />of Agency <br />Agreement <br />with MnDOT <br />Motion Carried <br />18. Consideration <br />of Resolution <br />Establishing <br />Policy on <br />Placement of <br />Planning Signs <br />Motion Carried <br />Motion Failed <br />