Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View ity Council December 11, 1989 <br />. Regular Meet'ng Page Eight <br />residents, b t they were not opposed to the signs <br />• being constr cted of metal. <br />Motion/Secon Quick/Paone to amend Resolution <br />No. 2569 by pecifying under number 1 that the signs <br />be metal. <br />5 ayes nays <br />Jerry Linke, 2319 Knoll Drive, questioned why card- <br />board wouldn't be used, as the signs would only be <br />up a few wee s. <br />Mr. Minetor xplained the idea is the City would <br />purchase the signs and make them available, and <br />cardboard wo ld not be reusable, whereas metal signs <br />could be reu ed and would be much more legible. <br />Clerk/Admini trator Pauley pointed out the resolu- <br />tion calls f r placement within 10 days of making <br />application, and some development can take two to <br />six months before action is finalized, and cardboard <br />would not last that long. He further explained the <br />proposed policy is a permanent policy, in that while <br />the Council had directed Staff to put together a <br />temporary measure, nothing happened since that time <br />• that would require a temporary policy. <br />Mayor Hankn r pointed out they are trying to protect <br />the interes s of the people, both those who want to <br />know what i going on, and those who are trying to <br />do somethin to their property. <br />Motion/Seco <br />No. 2569, t <br />on each sig <br />5 ayes <br />Wuori/Quick to amend Resolution <br />ve number 3 call for a $50 deposit <br />0 nays <br />Motion Carried <br />Motion Carried <br />Ms. Hren re orted the landscaping has been completed 19. Consideration <br />on the prop rty in question, but the new sign has of Second <br />been erecte without the old sign being totally Reading and <br />removed, an the pole from the ol d sign has also Adoption of <br />been left u , as Mr. Bayerkohler says the ground Ordinance No. <br />is too hard to trench now. 480 <br />Mayor Hankn <br />a lessee, q <br />pointed out <br />adhered to <br />• on landscap <br />r reported she had received a call from <br />estioning what was being done. She <br />the development agreement was not <br />y Mr. Bayerkohler, and the changes made <br />ng were not adhered to either. <br />