Laserfiche WebLink
LandCor PC Reporf <br />May 7, 2003 <br />Page 2 <br />Parkin <br />The PUD establishes the parking requiremenf for an ofFice use at one space per 25Q <br />square feefi. The proposed office would consist of a maximum 15,000 square feet of gross <br />space. With that much area, a toiaE of �0 parking spaces wauld be r�quired. ADA <br />requirements indicate that of the 60 spaces, three need to be handicap accessible. The <br />plans show a�otal of 54 spaces, two of which are e�arked handicapped. To comply with <br />the PUD, either 6 aciditional stalls would nead to be shown or 1,500 square feet would <br />need io be eliminafed from the building. If the se#back for parking afong Long Lake Road <br />were 20 feet rather than 3� feet, three to four more sta(Is could be added fio the site plan. <br />Aceess & Circulation <br />There is one access driveway shown from Long Lake Road; no access is shown onto <br />County Road 10. The absence of an access or�to Caunty Highway 10 is consistent with <br />the goals established in �he carridor redeveEopment and revitalization plan adopted by Yhe <br />City Council. The Long Lake Road access is offset fio the north of Moundsview Drive by <br />about 100 fee#. No traffic conflic�s would be anficipated because of this. The circulation <br />withir� the development is not optimum however there is s�afficient space in the drive aisles <br />and there is adequafe space provided to back oufi of a11 parking spaces. <br />Lic�htinq. <br />The applicant has submitted a photometric analysis of the site, however it is not known if <br />the analysis complies with City Code as the foot-candle readings are provided only for the ' <br />parking lot area. (The City Code indicates that foof-candle measurements shal[ be showr� <br />up to the centerfine of any abutting streei right of ways.} Additionai[y, the photometric <br />analysis daes not indicate the lighting fixtures fio be used, the pole height or the individual <br />fumens specificatians. Any building mounted lighting would also need to be shown and <br />figured info the photometric analysis. The attached resoEution includes this provision. <br />DrainaAe <br />The plans indicafe that the site would be servicecf by a series of catch basins linked <br />together by a storm sewer which empties into the existing NURP pond at fhe rear of the <br />property. (The existing pond was consfrucfied with the ariginal development to <br />accommodate the fufure build-ou# of the site. Permits would need to be obtained from <br />Rice Creek Watershed District before the City will issue any buifding permits for the project. <br />Tf1e applicant and any utility subcontrac#ors shall meet with the Public Works departmenf <br />for final utility pfan approval. <br />Garbaqe Enciosure <br />As shown on the site plan, the garbage enclosure wauld be located on the south side ofi <br />the praperty. No details were provided regarding the enclosure's construction, however <br />the PU D indicates that �he enclosure shall be af ihe same construction as fihe b�ailding with <br />solid, opaque, latching gates. Chain link is not an acceptable gate materiai. _. <br />