My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2012 11:08:57 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:48:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I�Ioun�s'View Planni�� Ca�nmt�sion 11�ay 7, 2003 <br />itegular Meeti�g Page 3 <br />6e Co�x�iclea�ation of I)evelopme�t I�evievv 12ec��e��s lte�a�-din� Properties L,ocated a� <br />2436 a��t 2442 �-Iflghway 10 <br />Community Development I�irector Ericson explained wl�ere the parcels were <br />provided an overview of the developrnent. <br />Director Ericson indicated that the applicant would need 60 <br />shrinlc the size of the building to conform to Y1ie Code. <br />Director Ericson indicated the applicant would need to <br />adj acent residential properties to confoim to the Code. <br />Dirscior Ericson indicated the applicant would need to <br />to the garbage enclosure. <br />Director Ericson ind'zcated the landscaping plaiis <br />review it and make recommenda#ions for specifi� <br />Director Ericson indicated that no sign plan,had been <br />what type of sign is ailowed. <br />irig"'stalls or would need to <br />hotometric analysis for. the ' <br />z7-tlier spccifications with regard <br />d,look nice but'tlie; City.�'orester wili <br />igs. ` <br />�tnitfied yei but t�ie PUD will dictate <br />_ <br />Director Ericson indicated that it looks as though fihe site plan submitted was carried over from a <br />;_; � previous site plan so there are some n.Qtes to be revised on it �` <br />Directar Ericson indicated that ali dimensional requi�emerits and setbacks are met for Outparcel <br />B. <br />Directar Erxcson iiidicated tYiat Staff is recomrnending that the developer revise the plans and <br />correct them as nated but feels no �-eason not to approve the development review at the next <br />meeting. <br />Commiss��oner Mil�er asked if Staff addressed ihe distance from ihe pond as it seems there would <br />be additional parking available <br />D�ector Ericson indicated the prablem is that the pond is already there and, if it is adequate to <br />,,, <br />stu't the needs of the site��t may nat be possible to change it. <br />:: vvu. <br />Zwim asked hovv long Rice Creek would iake to review this development. <br />indicated it usually talces from 30 to 45 days for Rice Creelc Watershed <br />Audie Tarpley adci�essed the Commission and apoiogized far the shortcomings in the drawings <br />and explazned that Iimited engineering work was done in case the project is h�rned down. He <br />then said that the buiidzng is 12,500 square feet of useable space and that is what they based the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.