My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2012 11:08:57 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:48:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Niouncis V��vv Ptannin� Coenmiss2oza <br />Reguiar 1Vleeti�a� <br />I1�ay 7, 2003 <br />Pa�e 4 <br />parking on. He further commented ihat #he pians would be amended and they would meet all <br />City requirements should the project proceed. <br />Chair Stevenson asked if �he ex�ra spaces could be added. <br />Mr. Tarpley indicated that they had tried to respect the setb <br />site with some consideration from the City. <br />Ghair Stevenson commented that the Commission is <br />affect the surrounding area and will ensure that the d <br />�ut„could add six rnoYe spaces on <br />•e of haw parking issues cari ; <br />has adequate parkin�::: <br />Commissioner Miller asked how many uses were expected for tbe b <br />Mr. T'arpley indicated he expected four or five and na rxiore tlian six <br />Commissioner Johnsvn asked ii the tenants would be n�edical and dental .: <br />Mr. Tarpley indicated he thought so but lost a b�g user that he`was planning on. He then said that <br />he has been talking to other medical practihoners but they are not as heavy�as a use as what was <br />initially proposed. <br />The Commission asked whether a <br />Mr. Tarpley indicated he was <br />disnzpt their,relationships wit <br />7. Cc��sider���o� of <br />Oa•c�����ices �2e1� <br />Communi <br />for the Go <br />�e shop was possible .� ,' <br />very l�ard on a coffee shop but said he did not want to <br />adlords by i�aming names. <br />, a ltesoiution iteca�mending Approval of'I'wo <br />Zo�rng and Ilieensang in I�o�nds Vfew <br />overviewed the history of the pawnshop ardinances <br />Dir�ctor Ericson indicated he had not added the manager definition but will do so. He then <br />asked for elarification on the bizy hold and the pawn hoid and reviewed the other changes that <br />weie made based on the'e1.�.iscussions at the Iast meeting. <br />Director Ericsoi2 'vidieated that Mr. Sonterre had raised a number of issues at the last meeting and <br />averviewed therr� witl� the Commission. He then said that ihe way fhe Code is drafted <br />coucerning �iolations and revocation allows the City flexibility to review the violation and malce <br />a detelnlii�ation as to whether it warrants revocation. <br />Director Ericson indicated that Staff had reviewed the fees oiothe� cities and found Moiu�ds <br />View's fees to be in the middle. He then said that if ii is determined that the recommended fee is <br />inadequate the fee would be changed immediately. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.