My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2012 11:08:57 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:48:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
--: =� - I:i:a=. .-'---. . � .:� .� �- '_°���. __�.. ie= �___..,.._.. .Yr_...___ ... l�.1 =-� ° _. _..... L''c,i:� _ ..v.=�..._ :_ ' _.. _ y <br />Longview Estates PC Report <br />November 19, 2003 <br />Page 2 <br />Staff pointed out that the Commission's role in this process was to review the subdivision <br />and to assess whether it satisfied the requirements and standards of the Zoning Code, <br />Subdivision Code and the Comprehensive Plan. The hydrology issues and wetland <br />alterations, while undeniably a critical component of the subdivision, are outside of the <br />Planning Commission's scope of review. From a technical standpoint, the subdivision DOES <br />meet all Code requirements. From an intensity of use perspective, considering the various <br />environmental factors, the question that needs to be answered is, Can the parcel support a <br />15-lot subdivision? <br />Nov 5, 2003 Public Hearinq: The residents who spoke at the public hearing on November 5, <br />2003 were opposed to the development, many stressing the hydrological conditions of the <br />site and the potential impact of the development. Others were concerned about the traffic <br />impacts of the proposed 15-lot subdivision. Some Longview Drive residents questioned the <br />suitability ofi the soils for construction and what the impact would be from the extensive fill <br />brought onto the site. Two letters from residents opposing the proposal were provided to the <br />Planning Commission at the November 5th meeting. These two letters, along with a third <br />letter received after the meeting, are attached to this report. A final issue was raised <br />concerning liability, insofar as who would be liable if basements flooded or if other damages <br />occurred. While the City Attorney will address liability at the City Council meeting, generally <br />speaking if damages directly attributable to the development occur, the developerwould be <br />held responsible. Before any work could commence on the site, the developer would be <br />required to provide a financial guarantee to address and correct any deficiencies. <br />At the Commission meeting, Mr. Harstad displayed and described to the Commission and <br />residents the previous plans that had been submitted forthis land, beginning with the original <br />eleven-lot subdivision and concluding with a 26-lot subdivision. The current 15-lot <br />subdivision represents the maximum and most intense development possible for the seven <br />acre site. <br />At the meeting on November 5, the Planning Commission requested documentation from <br />Rice Creek Watershed District regarding the previous submittal and reports drafted for the <br />watershed's Board of Commissioners. Thus far staff has only received a permit status <br />report. If the original report to the Board or Commissioners is received after this report is <br />completed, staff will provide copies at the meeting on November 19th. <br />Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designates the <br />Longview Estates parcel as single family detached. W hile this designation is consistent with <br />the proposed subdivision, one of the stated goals under the land use component of the <br />Comprehensive Plan is to "Ensure that community development is compatible with features <br />of the natural environment and is accommodated without destroying desirable environmental <br />features and natural amenities." Any subdivision should be accomplished with as little <br />impact and alteration as possible. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.