Laserfiche WebLink
IVIounds Vie�v Plan�ui� C`or�►r�rissio� <br />12egupar IVIe�Yi�g <br />I�ecember 1S, 2002 <br />Page 4 <br />on siaying and asked �he Commission to consider those residents that will have to live with what <br />happens at the property. <br />Richard Sonterre, 5�60 Red Oak Drive, addressed the Commission and refe <br />to Mr. Ericson, He then said he is spealcing in opposition to the rezoning as <br />a precedent for the other properties on the block to request a s�m���� rezanir <br />has concerns in terms of how this would adversely affect hous���2���ues in e <br />�< <br />that the transien� nature of renters in that area have left conc�����aboui secu <br />adding more persons would add to those concerns. :�'�`� �.�_ <br />�,��.... <br />Mr. Sonterre indicated that the applicant intends to sell the pr� <br />the sale priee for two praperties sold in the area and simplc tn� <br />owner occupied properiy based on the rates for a 30-year con} <br />get in excess of $1,d00 out of both units to ma.ke it financiall� <br />,,,� <br />math indicates to him that the new property owner would �`�ec <br />to reco�zp the investment. , , „ <br />Ms. Thunstrom indicated she had not had a <br />request and is surprised at the apposition to <br />cause a lot of trouble or disharmony with h� <br />her request. . , <br />Director Ericson asked Ms. <br />withdrawal in writing. <br />The Com�i����on recesse�i "� <br />b. C;�gi�i��r���ci'� �f a <br />, <br />Avey��� �c���.�'h t��';�_ <br />� s � <br />Comm����Developtr�er�t � <br />�,, � <br />park' ,�; ron Greer�field a� �ts <br />re�;� for review. _ _. <br />t�:�:� ��,rr�., <br />€�a��i� <br />so <br />5:;� �. <br />io his �,e��er sent <br />��ls iti �vould set <br />�� al�o said he <br />an amount in exc��� c�f ' <br />es that it could not be a�� <br />r�e��-t�,a�e and the need to <br />eas�yble. T-�� �hei� said that #he <br />to turn �� ��tc� a��i,�. plex in order <br />.h� nei�hbars cancernin� her <br />40 p. m. <br />ie does not want to <br />respecifully withdraw <br />City could obtai� her <br />Parking Ellong ihe East Side of G�°ee�afreld <br />Ericson indicated the Commission had discussed restricting <br />�ting and Staffhad researched the matter and provided a Staff <br />ctor Ericson indica��� the original developer, Mr. Mezzenga, was before the City a couple of <br />s ago and had ind���ted that the building he intended to construct did not need all the parl�ing <br />� s� <br />ired by th� Cit���'Code and was granted a variance from the parl�ing requirement of 20 <br />es cio�r� ta X�'ypaces. He then indicated that Stafihad asked the Police Department ta <br />��c�� it�#`c�z�z�xitfion on any parlting issues on thai side of the street. <br />Dir�ctor Ericson indieated the �ommission needed to consider whether there is good reason to <br />recommend to Cou�cil that parking be restricted on the east side of Greenfield as it is legai to <br />p�rk there and restricting parkiiig in that area forces the parking issue further dovvn the block. <br />He then indicaied he received a. call fi-om the manager at Crreenf°ield Estates who believes there <br />have been vehicles overflowing from the pi•operty into the Greenfield Estates parking lot. He <br />, <br />, <br />1 <br />