Laserfiche WebLink
1lilou�ds iTievv ��aa��ing Commissio� .Tanua�y 22, 2003 <br />12egular IYiee�ing pag� 2 <br />5. Cot�tinued l)iscussao� on lZestricting 1'arlcing along Gr-eenfield r�veza�e <br />Coinmunity Development Director Ericson provided an update on tl�e parking situation along <br />Greenfield Avenue indicating that, after the matter was brought to the attention of the - <br />Commission, Officer Broos was asl�ed to observe th;e area. He tllen expiained that Officer Brose <br />had observed the area and recommended postii�g a sign no paricing here to corner just north of <br />the access point for the multifamily housing. He also indicated that it would be possible to <br />recornmend posting the entire east side of Greenfield as no parking but that may be excessive. <br />Director Ericson indicated that at the last zneeti�ig the propexty owner had conveyed to him a <br />wallingness to expand the parking lot. He then indicated there is 28 feet of green space between <br />the parking lot and Greenfield and adding one parking stall on either side would ��vork but adding <br />a second stall on either side would encroach into the right-of-way by 7 feet, He further <br />coxnrriented that it would be an option but the property owner c�vould need to apply for a variance <br />to amend the previously g�-anted variance to a zero foot setback as well as execute a limited use <br />agreement to control use of the right-of-way. <br />Director Ericson indicated ihe lirnited use agreement would protect the City from bearing the <br />cost of removing and replacing the driveway should it $ecozne necessary to access utilities that <br />may be in that right-of-way. He also indicated that one benefit of`the,�ariance amendznent is that <br />the Commission could require a development agxeerrient that would give the City control of the <br />site, wl�ich it currently does not have �Ie`then said there have b`een issues at the site that could <br />have been addressed by a develop <br />development. <br />Director Ericson indicated thai on <br />variance the hardship requirement <br />situation cari nieei the criteria to p <br />impact to ihe green space if the p"a <br />appearance tnat;XS: <br />�. of the <br />one been compieted required for #his <br />wbacks of the variance is that in arder to gxant a <br />;d to`lie met and Staff does not feel that the <br />hardship. He also indicated that there would be an <br />�ere expanded that wouid detract from the residential <br />Director �ricson indicated fhe City has not received an application for a variance amendment but <br />the property owner has expressed a willingness to do so. He then indicated he had asked the <br />public works depat-tment to comiilent on any potential issues with using the right-of-way but <br />pnlilic worlcs has declmed to comment pending receipt of an application. He fizrther commented <br />tliat there is a water m�n in the general area that would need to be located. <br />Ericson inciicated a resolution far conaideration had been drafted restricting parlcing <br />north of the northerr� most access to Greenfield Estates. <br />Johnson asked if adding the two stalis would push the parking into the right-of- <br />way. <br />Director Ericson indicated the variance previously granted allows them a 10 foot setback and <br />adding the two stalls would make it a two-foot setback. <br />?'} <br />