Laserfiche WebLink
; <br />IVloa�nd� �liewr Planning Com�assion January 22, 2003 <br />l�egular l�eeti�g Page 3 <br />Commissione�• Miller asked if the origiz�al variance was for the numbez- of stalls. <br />Director Ericson indicated the variance was for the setbacic. <br />Commissioner Miller asked why there was not a developmant agreeinent originally. <br />Director Ericson indicated he was not sure wl�y a development agreement was not reguired but <br />said, in retrospect, one should have been done but they typically were not clone for sriaaller <br />developments and this developnient was perceived as a small developrnent. He then indicated <br />that aIl commercial developments now require a developme�it agreement. <br />Commissio�ier Zwirn aslced why the address for the building �s 2402 County Road I when it <br />faces G�'eenfield, <br />Director Ericson indicated the property owner requested.the County Road I address and is <br />allowed io do so as the property is on the conler of Creetlf"ield and County Roac1 I. <br />Chair Stevenson said he feels ihere should be a`number of feet listed in tlie resolution to malce it <br />clear for Council that the Comrnission <br />Dizector Ericson indicated that Staff would need <br />` ' feet begins. <br />Cornmissioner Miller indicated she thought the:E <br />Road I. <br />5 <br />of the apartments. <br />point for where the 75 <br />75 feet back frorn Courxty <br />not allowed 30 feet back frorn the intersection already. <br />postii�g no parking to 75 feet would just push the <br />parking fart�,er'dow�� the b19c1�. <br />Com�issioner Johnson indicated' he would rather see the parking stalls added and approval of a <br />two foot variance befor� restricfing parking but, if the issue is not resolv�d, he is not against <br />pasti'ing the whole east side of Greeniield no parlcing. <br />' `Coinmissioner Miiler; <br />street no parking <br />she did not thinlc it would be fair to the residents to marlc the whole <br />D�,rector Ericson c�arified that the City does not have the power to force the property owner to <br />apply for the variance and expand the parlcing iot. He then said that posting the street no parking <br />would force the property owner to work to resolve the parking issue by applying for the variance <br />to expand the parking lot. <br />