My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2012 11:08:57 AM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:48:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
707
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1VIo��ds V�ew Pl�ns�ing Commission <br />I.tegular 1Vleeting <br />I)eeetnb�a° ��, 2002 <br />Page 6 <br />Commissioner Scotch asked what type of businesses had moved into the building. <br />Steve Farrell, owner of the building at 2402 County Road I, indicated his m <br />occupies the upper flower and the lower side acconimadates a title company <br />agent. :!'; <br />;;,���. <br />Commissioner Johnson asked whether there was also an <br />Mr. Farrell confirmed that the �tate Farm agent subleases s <br />that he was not made aware of any issues with this building <br />street would not be allowed because, when he bought the p <br />enough parking and planned on using on-sireet parking to � <br />commented that ke has 16 employees and restricting on-st�� <br />him to hire employees as they will not be willing to walk bIi <br />his business. <br />Commissioi�er Johnson asked how many busi <br />custamer parking on site and use on-street p� <br />I�irector Ericson said he could think o# <br />Sti�et. rti � <br />�`%% <br /><�;/ <br />%�/ <br />/ii�� <br />Commissioner Johnson asked wh����e <br />Director;�`�G�,Qn indicated �:�a�t ��� �it} <br />allevr �'� �.r1�i zssues_ � � <br />���,� � <br />Commission�� Jc����Q�,cammer�#�;d t�a <br />responded by ��tir��; t�e east sid� c�f i <br />to <br />to <br />� <br />toid that parking t��i th� ' <br />cnew there was ��ot ' <br />e!his business. He further <br />hri�uld rnal�e it difficult for <br />�, wbx�1�' ��rould damage <br />zi�u �'�cw do zio� cantain their own <br />�� <br />,\� <br />0'''3�other px�p�"erty wher'�.,t��i clientele overflows onto the <br />r <br />� >Y <br />, �' �� , <br />City docs u�ith tha e. <br />has �>t�r�er� �� • hard with the property owner to <br />��.�berts off 10 caused similar problems and the City <br />���waod "No Parking". <br />i�s�,���er Johns�rr� 3ntiit'�4�r1 �iP feels for �he property owner but almost every business <br />'�eets the parl�n� r��u�t c,a-riiynts for their business so he has an issue with a business owner <br />ig on using an-stre�� par��n�; �ta accommodate clients and employees. He further <br />,nted that there ar��iu��ness owners that have spent a lot of money acquiring additional <br />; <br />�i�d commented that when this building was presented to t4�e Commission i� <br />t ihere would be 15 employees. <br />r�vhat the intent was. <br />Commissioner Johnson ind'icated the Commission was told this was to be a low intensity office <br />building with one or iwo tenants. <br />l�/Ii-. Farreil indicated that it is plainly evident that the building was designed for four businesses. <br />� �i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.