Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 27, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 13 <br /> <br />City Attorney Long stated this was correct. He indicated the lease agreement is essentially as it <br />was originally presented, with the changes the Council suggested at the Work Session incorporated <br />therein. He advised that if the Council is comfortable with this, they could move to authorize the <br />Mayor and the Interim Administrator to execute the document, once the final information is <br />inserted into the blank spaces of the document. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney stated at the previous Work Session he had brought forward a question <br />pertaining to a changeable or movable type of billboard face, however, this did not appear to be <br />addressed in the lease agreement. <br /> <br />Superintendent Hammerschmidt indicated this has been addressed in Item 3 of the document. City <br />Attorney Long advised that the last sentence of the third paragraph, which contains the language <br />“tri-vision signs or other multi-faced signs…” was an attempt to address the concerns Council <br />Member Stigney had brought forward. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney inquired if electronic type billboards would be permitted. <br /> <br />Superintendent Hammerschmidt indicated this was addressed in terms of allowing this to the extent <br />that the State would, and the State does not allow electronic billboards to exist. City Attorney <br />Long stated this language was contained in the permit. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney inquired if the State’s position in this regard was subject to change, and <br />if so, would these types of billboards automatically be allowed. <br /> <br />City Attorney Long indicated an additional clause could be added to insure greater security, <br />although he believed they had left this out because it was somewhat redundant. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson advised that the City’s Sign Code addresses this matter, in that it <br />provides that any type of electronic sign adjacent to a freeway is disallowed. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that Eller Media should be responsible for the removal of the <br />billboards, at their expense, after the term has expired. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty stated there is language in Item 9, which indicates “Lessee shall bear all <br />the costs and expenses of modifications to or repair or removal of the billboards.” City Attorney <br />Long pointed out that this clause is in contemplation of anything that might come forward at the <br />end of the lease period or during the term of the lease, such as State legislation requiring the <br />removal of the billboards, and this would be the responsibility of Eller Media. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Quick. To Authorize the Mayor and the Acting City Administrator <br />to Execute the Lease Agreement, Following the Insertion of Information into the Blank Spaces <br />Contained in the First and Eight Paragraphs of the Document. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />E. Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution 5417, a Resolution <br />Concerning an Interim Use Permit Allowing Two Billboards on SYSCO <br />Property. <br />