My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2000/04/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
Agenda Packets - 2000/04/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:22 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 2:30:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/10/2000
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/10/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 27, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 14 <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin opened the Public Hearing at 8:14 p.m. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated DeLite Outdoor Sign Company representing Sysco Minnesota <br />is requesting an interim use permit to install two billboards on their property at 2400 County Road <br />J. He stated the Planning Commission reviewed this request at a couple of their meetings, and <br />forwarded to the City Council a resolution recommending approval of the interim use permit. He <br />stated the Planning Commission gave significant thought to this request, as it did with the City’s <br />request, and had some concerns with regard to the design of the proposed billboards. He indicated <br />the Commission recommended that the design of the billboards be revised to be more consistent <br />with, and aesthetically complimentary to those billboards proposed and approved for the golf <br />course. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated as was the case with the previous interim use permit, the <br />Planning Commission examined the siting requirements in terms of spacing, maximum sign area, <br />orientation of sign faces, maximum sign height, obstruction, and all requirements which are <br />specified in Ordinance 644. He advised that those requirements are met, with the exception of the <br />minimum spacing requirement, which requires that there be a 1,000-foot spacing between any two <br />billboards. He explained that this requirement is not met in that there is a billboard on the City’s <br />golf course property, which would be closer than 1,000 feet, at a distance of approximately 550 <br />feet. He indicated the Planning Commission recommended approval of the interim use permit <br />subject to the approval of a variance to allow for a reduced spacing of the billboards. He advised <br />that the applicant has made application for a variance, and it is scheduled to come before the <br />Planning Commission for discussion on April 5, and action on April 19. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson provided the Council with a recently revised copy of Resolution 5417. <br />He indicated one of the revisions is contained in the third stipulation of Page 2, which indicates <br />“The design of the proposed billboards shall include the same decorative design appearance as the <br />billboards approved for the Bridges Golf Course, in a form similar to that attached as Exhibit B.” <br />He explained there are two attachments to the resolution; Exhibit A, which indicates the locations <br />of the signs, and Exhibit B, which is a mock up of Eller Media’s proposal for the golf course, <br />which has been approved by the City, with a blank sign face. He stated this depiction was not to <br />scale, however, it was representative of what the City has approved, and what the City Council <br />would be requesting from DeLite Sign Company. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson provided the Council with DeLite Sign Company’s response to the <br />Planning Commission’s request, which is the monopole design with a brick wrap. He indicated <br />there was some discrepancy between what the City is requesting, and what DeLite Sign Company <br />is proposing, and this should be resolved prior to action on this matter. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson pointed out that perhaps action on this item should be tabled until the <br />applicant has obtained the variance as required, and City Attorney Long may wish to address this <br />point. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated, as with Resolution 5419, there is a clause that stipulates that <br />this interim use permit would become effective upon the effective date of Ordinances 655, 656 <br />and 657. He advised that the last clause of the resolution indicates “The interim use permit would <br />expire on July 1, 2015, or at such time that the lease expires or the billboards become abandoned <br />or remain unused for a period of more than six months, whichever occurs first.” <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.