Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 22, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 31 <br /> <br />He explained that if they sought a grant from DTED in the amount of $400,000, as long as the <br />City provided at least $400,000 of Tax Increment Financing assistance, this would be considered <br />the local match. He advised that the City would not be required to contribute any money, over <br />and above the amount of Tax Increment Financing assistance that was provided. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty inquired if the City would automatically be obligated to match the funds, <br />if this grant is approved. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Carroll stated the City would be obligated to match the <br />funds, if they would like to receive the funds. He explained that if DTED grants the City <br />$400,000, and the Mermaid Project progresses, and the City Council decides not to provide any <br />financial assistance of any kind, there would be no funds to match the DTED grant, and the City <br />would lose the grant. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty inquired if the City would not be obligated in this case. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Carroll stated this was correct. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomason inquired what amount was being proposed for application. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Carroll stated he would research the original calculations. <br />He advised that staff was considering both the land acquisition costs, and the cost of constructing <br />a holding pond, and routing surface water runoff into the pond. He indicated this was the <br />formula utilized to determine the original amount. He pointed out that the City could potentially <br />acquire property, and then would be required to own that property in perpetuity, in order for the <br />pond to be located upon it. He stated one of the requirements of the DTED grant is that you <br />could not utilize the grant funds to acquire property that would ultimately go to a private <br />company or a private individual. He stated the City could do this, however, if the did so, they <br />would have to refund a portion of the grant equivalent to the market value of the property. He <br />indicated staff was considering a grant amount in the range of $350,000 to $400,000, which <br />would make the application slightly more competitive, and would not appear to be overreaching. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Carroll pointed out that of the two million dollars that is <br />available in this grant cycle, only 1.5 million is available for Metropolitan area communities. He <br />advised that by law, 25 percent of the funds is required to go to communities in the greater <br />Minnesota area, therefore, the total amount of available DTED funds was 1.5 million, and if the <br />City requested a third of that amount, it might undermine the chances of receiving it. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty inquired if the City would basically be utilizing this grant to purchase <br />property upon which to place the holding pond, and the City would own that pond. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator stated this was correct. He stated the City would own the <br />property on which the pond is located, as well. He pointed out that the City might wish to own <br />the property for purposes of maintenance and maintaining control over the pond, as they would <br />likely not desire to delegate that responsibility to a private property owner. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty commented that the City might be liable to undertake this project, <br />regardless of the grant funds. <br />