Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 22, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 32 <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Carroll stated this was correct. He explained that if the <br />funds come from DTED, it becomes City money, and then must be utilized in some manner <br />comparable to what was set forth in the grant application. He advised that the owners of the <br />Mermaid would not be solely responsible for the cost of the holding pond, because there is <br />surface water drainage coming from other sites, including some of the businesses located farther <br />down on the County road. He pointed out that this being the case, the City could attempt to pass <br />some of the costs on to those property owners, however, inevitably, the City would have some <br />financial responsibility, and this is a potential means to obtain funds for this. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Thomason/Stigney. To Approve Resolution No 5323, a Resolution <br />Authorizing Application for Redevelopment Grant. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Carroll stated there was a related topic that Economic <br />Development Director Jopke may wish to address. He explained that the Legislature is looking <br />at whether or not they are going to renew funding for this program, and Community <br />Development Director Jopke had spoken with an individual that date, who had inquired if the <br />City would be willing to go on record as supporting this program. <br /> <br />City Administrator Whiting stated a request had come in to staff, which was related to the <br />funding levels that the State would appropriate for this program. He indicated this request was <br />being made by a lobbying group that works on behalf of communities around the State for <br />additional funding, and they were attempting to see which communities might be in support of <br />this program. He advised that he had no further details at this time, and believed that prior to <br />requesting any statement from the Council, more information should be brought forward <br />regarding the status of this matter at the legislative level. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator inquired if the Council would like to touch upon this matter <br />at the next Council Work Session. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin stated could discuss this matter briefly, if further information is available. <br /> <br />City Administrator Whiting indicated staff would report back to the Council in this regard. <br /> <br />E. Resolution 5324 Children’s Home Agreement <br /> <br />Assistant to the City Administrator Schmidt stated the item before the Council is Resolution <br />5324, which authorizes the City to enter into a new lease agreement with Children’s Home <br />Society. She explained that this item was actually before the Council, and approved in <br />Resolution 5295, although a few modifications have been made to the contract, and staff had <br />wanted to bring those modifications to the attention of the Council. <br /> <br />Assistant to the City Administrator Schmidt advised that one of the modifications indicates that <br />the base rent of $30,000 would be paid in quarterly installments during the first year, and that <br />Children’s Home Society would be liable for the 1999 tuition, in any year they defaulted on the <br />contract. <br />