08-01-2018 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Item 05A Page 2 2. The geographical area involved. The proposed addition will be behind the existing detached accessory building. 3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. It is not anticipated that the accessory building will have any effect on area property values. 4. The character of the surrounding area. The accessory building will be set back 33’ from the east side yard property line. The adjacent property (2200 Bronson Dr) includes a detached accessory building 864 square feet in size, and is the nearest structure to the proposed accessory building addition (45’ distance, building to building). 5. The demonstrated need for such use. The applicant has demonstrated a need for an allowable use (e.g. accessory building). Summary Doug Watson is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit for an oversized garage, 1,536 sq ft. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Recommendation The Planning Commission is requested to consider the following options: 1. Resolution 1085-18, recommending approval the Conditional Use Permit. 2. The Planning Commission may choose to recommend denial of Resolution 1085-18. If the Commission chooses this option, Staff would need to be directed to draft a resolution of denial with findings of fact appropriate to support the denial. 3. Table the request. If additional information is needed before a decision can be rendered or if more discussion is needed, the Commission can simply move to table the request until such information has been provided. Because of the 60-day requirement (Deadline: Sep 27, 2018) the Commission would need to act upon the request as soon as reasonably possible to avoid an inadvertent approval.