Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Case VR2017-001 <br />September 6, 2017 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />Recommendation <br />The Planning Commission is requested to consider the following options, including <br />conducting a Public Hearing for the Variance request: <br /> <br />1. Resolution 1077-17, recommending approval the Variance is attached, if the Commission <br />chooses this action. <br /> <br />A 2/3’s majority vote (5 of 7) is required to approve a Variance.3 <br /> <br />2. The Planning Commission may choose to deny the Variance. If the Commission chooses <br />this option, Staff would need to be directed to draft a resolution of denial with findings of fact <br />appropriate to support the denial. <br /> <br />3. Table the request. If additional information is needed before a decision can be rendered or <br />if more discussion is needed, the Commission can simply move to table the request until <br />such information has been provided. Because of the 60-day requirements (Deadline: Oct <br />13, 2017) the Commission would need to act upon the request as soon as reasonably <br />possible to avoid an inadvertent approval. <br /> <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br />________________________ <br />Jon Sevald, AICP <br />City Planner / Supervisor <br /> <br />Attachments <br />1. Applicant’s Narrative <br />2. Zoning Map <br />3. Aerial Map <br />4. Site Photos <br />5. Resolution 1077-17 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />3 City Code, Section 1125.02, Subd 1(b) (Organization and Meetings)