My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
July
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
Council Minutes 1992
>
July
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2007 1:06:21 PM
Creation date
7/31/2007 1:06:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council <br />regular Meeting <br />Page Sixteen <br />July 13, 1992 <br />the same zone or vicinity and results from lot size or shape, topography, or <br />other circumstances over which the owners of the property, since enactment <br />of this Code, have not had control. <br />Councilmembers were polled as to their opinion. Councilmember <br />Rickaby - no, Councilmember Blanchard - yes, Councilmember Quick - <br />yes, Councilmember Wuori - yes and Mayor Linke - yes. <br />the City Council has found that the request is the minimum <br />variance which would alleviate the hardship and does not convey <br />certain privileges upon the applicant that are not enjoyed by <br />other property owners within the City. <br />the City Council approves the variance request within the 100 foot <br />wetland setback requirement. <br />the Developer has requested a Conditional Use Permit for working <br />in a flood plain. <br />the City's Engineering Consultant, Peter Sabee, has reviewed <br />the Development Proposal and found that there is not adverse <br />affect upon the flood plain. <br />the City Council approves the Conditional Use Permit for filling <br />in a flood plain. <br />the Developer has requested vacation of City-owned right-of-way. <br />the City Council approves the requested vacation of right-of-way. <br />the Developer has requested that property be accepted in lieu of <br />the Park Dedication Fee. <br />the City Council does not accept land in lieu of Park Dedication <br />Fee. <br />the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal and <br />recommended approval in Resolution No. 339-92. <br />it is the practice of the City Council to recommend approval or <br />denial of a development in total. <br />the City Council of the City of Mounds View approves the <br />development proposal known as Greenfield Estates as the request <br />does meet or exceed all requirements for development as defined <br />within the Mounds View Municipal Code. <br />ouncilmember Rickaby stated that this is the outcome of our having changed <br />~he wetland ordinance, having a storm water management plan as our way of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.